Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 158, 2017
The XXIII International Workshop “High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory” (QFTHEP 2017)
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Top-quark Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715804007
Published online 24 October 2017
  1. Abe, F. et al. (CDF Collaboration), Observation of top quark production in pp collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2626 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Abachi et al. (D0 Collaboration), Observation of the top quark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2632 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 40, 100001 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Improved determination of the width of the top quark, Phys. Rev. D 85, 091104 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the ratio B(tWb)/B(tWq) in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 736, 33–57 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. CDF Collaboration Direct Measurement of the Total Decay Width of the Top Quark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 202001 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. “CMS Collaboration Bounding the top quark width using final states with two charged leptons and two jets at √s = 13 TeV”, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. ATLAS collaboration, “Direct top-quark decay width measurement in the tt lepton+jets channel at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment” ATLAS-CONF-2017-056, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. P.P. Giardino, C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 96, 011901 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Kauer and G. Passarino, JHEP 1208, 116 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Caola, K. Melnikov, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054024 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit, S. Pozzorini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 052001 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Moch and P. Uwer, Phys.Rev. D 78, 034003 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Olive et al., Particle Data Group Collaboration, Chin.Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  15. E.E. Boos, V.E. Bunichev, L.V. Dudko, V.I. Savrin, A.V. Sherstnev, Phys. Atom.Nucl. 69, 1317 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 189 (2009). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Bernreuther, J. Phys. G 35, 083001 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Larios and R. Martinez and M. A. Perez, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21, 3473–3494 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Han, K. Whisnant, B.L. Young and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7241–7248 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M.J. Herrero, 29th International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Barcelona, Spain (2011). [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Johan. R. Frederix, J. -M. Gerard, A. Giammanco, M. Herquet, S. Kalinin, E. Kou, V. Lemaitre and F. Maltoni, F. Eur. Phys. J. C 49, 791–801 (2007). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Kauer, D. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Rev. D 65, 014021 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.