Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 166, 2018
KLOE-2 Workshop on e+ e- Collision Physics at 1 GeV
Article Number 00015
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201816600015
Published online 05 January 2018
  1. V.L Kashevarov et al. (A2 Collaboration at MAMI), arXiv:1701.04809 [nucl-ex]. [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Adlarson et al. (A2 Collaboration at MAMI), arXiv:1611.04739 [hep-ex]. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Adlarson et al. (A2 Collaboration at MAMI), arXiv:1609.04503 [hep-ex]. [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801 (120801). [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Blum, A. Denig, I. Logashenko, E. de Rafael, B.L Roberts, T. Teubner, G. Venanzoni, arXiv:1311.2198 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  6. G.W Bennett, et al. (The g-2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (072003). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, Z. Zhang. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1515 (1515). [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Benayoun, P. David, L. DelBuono, F. Jegerlehner, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 613 (2015). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Grange et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), FERMILAB-FN-0992-E, FERMILAB- DESIGN-2014-02. [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Mibe (J-PARC g-2 Collaboration), Chinese Physics C 34, 745 (745). [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Czarnecki and W.J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 64, 013014 (2001). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Nyffeler, Phys.Rev. D 94 no.5, 053006 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Pauk, M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 90, 113012 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. L.G Landsberg, Phys. Rep. 128, 301 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura, JHEP 1409, 091 (2014); G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, M. Procura, P. Stoffer, Phys. Lett. B 738, 6 (6); G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer JHEP 1509, 074 (074); see B. Kubis, S. Leupold, M. Procura, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  16. See C. Redmer, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 40, 100001 (2016). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H.J Behrend et al. CELLO Collaboration, Z. Phys. C 49 (1991) 401 (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Meijer Drees et al., SINDRUM Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 45, 1439 (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Czerwinski, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis, A. Kupsc, S. Leupold, P. Moskal, S. Schad-mand, arXiv:1207.6556 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Lazzeroni et al. (NA62 Collaboration), arXiv:1612.08162 [hep-ex]. [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Masjuan, Phys.Rev. D 86, 094021 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Hoferichter. B. Kubis, S. Leupold, F. Niecknig, S.P. Schneider, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3180 (3180); See S. Leupold, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Arnaldi et al., Phys. Lett. B 757, 47 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Arnaldi et al., Phys. Lett. B 677, 260 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Berghäuser et al., Phys. Lett. B 701, 562 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. P. Aguar-Bartolome et al. Phys. Rev. C 89, 044608 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  28. C. Hanhart, A. KupSc, U.-G. Meißner, F. Stollenwerk, and A. Wirzba, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2668 (2668); ibid. 75, 242 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  29. C.W Xiao, T. Dato, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis, U.-G. Meißner, A. Wirzba, arXiv:1509.02194 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  30. C. Terschlüsen, Diploma Thesis, University of Gießen, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  31. C. Terschlüsen, S. Leupold, and M. F. M. Lutz, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 190 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  32. R. Escribano, P. Masjuan, and P. Sanchez-Puertas, Phys. Rev. D 89, 034014 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Escribano, P. Masjuan, and P. Sanchez-Puertas, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 414 (2015). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Ablikim et al. BESIII collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 92, 012001 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  35. R.I Dzhelyadin et al., Phys. Lett. B 102, 296 (1981). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. B. Ananthanarayan, I. Caprini, and B. Kubis, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3209 (2014). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys., B 250, 465 (1985). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. G. st Hooft, Nucl. Phys., B 72, 461 (1974). [Google Scholar]
  39. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys., B 156, 269 (1979). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. R. Kaiser, H. Leutwyler, Eur. Phys. J., C 17, 623 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Escribano, P. Masjuan, J. J. Sanz-Cillero. JHEP, 05, 094 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich, E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B 321, 311 (1989). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  43. P. Bickert, P. Masjuan, S. Scherer, arXiv:1612.05473. [Google Scholar]
  44. J.R Batley et al. Phys. Lett., B 633, 173 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. N. Cabibbo. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93 121801 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. N. Cabibbo, G. Isidori, JHEP, 03 021 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, B. Kubis, A. Rusetsky, Phys. Lett. B 638, 187, (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. E. Gamiz, J. Prades, I. Scimemi, Eur. Phys. J., C 50, 405 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Bissegger, A. Fuhrer, J. Gasser, B. Kubis, A. Rusetsky, Nucl. Phys., B 806, 178 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. B. Kubis, S P. Schneider, Eur. Phys. J., C62, 511 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. N. Beisert, B. Borasoy, Nucl. Phys. A, 716 186 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. B. Borasoy, R. Nissler, Eur. Phys. J. A, 26 383 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  53. B. Borasoy, Ulf-G. Meissner, R. Nissler, Phys. Lett., B 643, 41 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. D. Alde et al. (LAPP collaboration), Phys. Lett., B 177 115 (1986), [Yad. Fiz.45,117(1987)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. A.M Blik et al. (GAMS4n collaboration), Phys. Atom. Nucl. 72 231 (2009), [Yad. Fiz.72,258(2009)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. V. Dorofeev et al. (VES Collaboration), Phys. Lett., B 651 22 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 83, 012003 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. H. Herminghaus et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 30, 3274 (1983). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. K.-H. Kaiser et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 593, 159 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. I. Anthony et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 301, 230 (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. S.J Hall et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 368, 698 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. J.C McGeorge et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 37, 129 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  63. P. Adlarson et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 024617 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  64. A. Starostin et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 055205 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. R. Novotny, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38, 379 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  66. A.R Gabler et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 346, 168 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  67. V. Blobel E. Lohrmann. Statistische Methoden der Datenanalyse. Teubner Studienbücher, Teub-ner, e-book http://www.desy.de/blobel/eBuch.pdf, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  68. S. Prakhov et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 035204 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. R.I Dzhelyadin et al., Phys. Lett. B 102, 296 (1981). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. S.P Schneider, B. Kubis, and F. Niecknig, Phys. Rev. D 86, 054013 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. I. Caprini, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014014 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. G. Köpp, Phys. Rev. D 10, 932 (1974). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. P. Masjuan, private communication with Sergey Prakhov, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  74. I.V Danilkin, C. Fernández-Ramírez, P. Guo, V. Mathieu, D. Schott, M. Shi, and A.P Szczepaniak, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094029 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  75. F. James, MINUIT Function Minimization and Error Analysis: Reference Manual Version 94.1, 1994. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.