Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 171, 2018
17th International Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter (SQM 2017)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Open Questions in the Understanding of Strangeness Production in HIC
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817103001
Published online 02 February 2018
  1. C.M. Ko, Open Questions in the Understanding of Strangeness Production in HIC – Theory Perspective, these proceedings [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Blume, C. Markert, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66, 834 (2011), 1105.2798 [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Antinori et al. (NA57), J. Phys. G32, 427 (2006), nucl-ex/0601021 [Google Scholar]
  4. B.I. Abelev et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. C77, 044908 (2008), 0705.2511 [Google Scholar]
  5. B.B. Abelev et al. (ALICE), Phys. Lett. B728, 216 (2014), [Erratum: Phys. Lett.B 734, 409(2014)], 1307.5543 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Agakishiev et al. (HADES), Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 132301 (2009), 0907.3582 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Adamczewski-Musch et al. (HADES) (2017), 1703.08418 [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Cebra, Open Questions in the Understanding of Strangeness Production in HIC – Future Directions, these proceedings [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, Phys. Lett. B673, 142 (2009), [Erratum: Phys. Lett. B 678, 516(2009)], 0812.1186 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Cleymans, I. Kraus, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, S. Wheaton, Phys. Rev. C74, 034903 (2006), hep-ph/0604237 [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Adam et al. (ALICE), Nature Phys. 13, 535 (2017), 1606.07424 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE), Phys. Lett. B712, 309 (2012), 1204.0282 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE), Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1594 (2011), 1012.3257 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. B.I. Abelev et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. C75, 064901 (2007), nucl-ex/0607033 [Google Scholar]
  15. B.I. Abelev et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. C79, 034909 (2009), 0808.2041 [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Hamieh, K. Redlich, A. Tounsi, Phys. Lett. B486, 61 (2000), hep-ph/0006024 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. V. Vislavicius, A. Kalweit (2016), 1610.03001 [Google Scholar]
  18. B.B. Abelev et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. C91, 024609 (2015), 1404.0495 [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Alt et al. (NA49), Phys. Rev. C78, 044907 (2008), 0806.1937 [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Hartnack, H. Oeschler, Y. Leifels, E.L. Bratkovskaya, J. Aichelin, Phys. Rept. 510, 119 (2012), 1106.2083 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Schuldes, Recent results from HADES, these proceedings [Google Scholar]
  22. B.I. Abelev et al. (STAR), Phys. Lett. B673, 183 (2009), 0810.4979 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 022301 (2015), 1408.4360 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Lednicky, V.L. Lyuboshits, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 35, 770 (1982), [Yad. Fiz.35,1316(1981)] [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Morita, T. Furumoto, A. Ohnishi, Phys. Rev. C91, 024916 (2015), 1408.6682 [Google Scholar]
  26. B.I. Abelev et al. (STAR), Science 328, 58 (2010), 1003.2030 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Adam et al. (ALICE), Phys. Lett. B754, 360 (2016), 1506.08453 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR) (2017), 1710.00436 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.