EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 171 (2018) EPJ Web Conf., 171 (2018) 16005 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 171, 2018
17th International Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter (SQM 2017)
Article Number 16005
Number of page(s) 4
Section QCD Phase Diagram and Beam Energy Scan (parallel session)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817116005
Published online 02 February 2018
  1. H. Stöcker and W. Greiner, Phys. Rept. 137, 277 (1986). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. A. Stephanov, PoS LAT 2006 (2006) 024. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 4816 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Nahrgang, T. Schuster, M. Mitrovski, R. Stock and M. Bleicher, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2143 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Luzum and P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. C 78, 034915 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Pratt, E. Sangaline, P. Sorensen, and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 202301 (2015) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Schmidhuber, “Deep learning in neural networks: An overview,” Neural Netw. 61, 85 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, Nature 521, 436 (2015). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Baldi, P. Sadowski, and D. Whiteson, Nature Commun. 5, 4308 (2014). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Baldi, P. Sadowski, and D. Whiteson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 111801 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Barnard, E. N. Dawe, M. J. Dolan, and N. Rajcic, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014018 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Moult, L. Necib, and J. Thaler, J. High Energy Phys. 12, 153 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Utama, W. C. Chen, and J. Piekarewicz, J. Phys. G 43, 114002 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Carrasquilla and R. G. Melko, Nat. Phys. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys4035 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Carleo and M. Troyer, Science 355, 602 (2017). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Torlai and R. G. Melko, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165134 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. G. Pang, K. Zhou, N. Su, H. Petersen, H. Stöcker and X. N. Wang, Nature Communications, in preprint. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Huovinen and P. Petreczky, Nucl. Phys. A 837, 26 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Sollfrank, P. Huovinen, M. Kataja, P. V. Ruuskanen, M. Prakash, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. C 55, 392 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. L. G. Pang, Q. Wang, and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 86, 024911 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  21. L. G. Pang, Y. Hatta, X. N. Wang, and B. W. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074027 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Z. W. Lin, C. M. Ko, B. A. Li, B. Zhang, and S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064901 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Shen, Z. Qiu, H. Song, J. Bernhard, S. Bass, and U. Heinz, Comput. Phys. Commun. 199, 61 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Gale, S. Jeon, B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 012302 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. E. Bernhard, J. S. Moreland, S. A. Bass, J. Liu, and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 94, 024907 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 (NIPS 2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, arXiv:1409.1556 [cs.CV]. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, Ann. Math. Statist. 22, 79 (1951). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Kingma and J. Ba, arXiv:1412.6980 [cs.LG]. [Google Scholar]
  30. F. Chollet, https://github.com/fchollet/keras. [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Abadi, et al., arXiv:1603.04467 [cs.DC], http://tensorflow.org/. [Google Scholar]
  32. G. E. Hinton, N. Srivastava, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. R. Salakhutdinov, arXiv:1207.0580 [cs.NE]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.