EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 175 (2018) EPJ Web Conf., 175 (2018) 01017 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 175, 2018
35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017)
Article Number 01017
Number of page(s) 18
Section 1 Plenaries (in order of appearance)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817501017
Published online 26 March 2018
  1. A. Oyanguren, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Bečireviić, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  3. T. DeGrand, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015001 (2016) [arXiv:1510.05018 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Nogradi and A. Patella, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, no. 22, 1643003 (2016) [arXiv:1607.07638 [hep-lat]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Pica, PoS LATTICE 2016, 015 (2016) [arXiv:1701.07782 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  6. C.-J. D. Lin, K. Ogawa and A. Ramos, JHEP 1512, 103 (2015) [arXiv:1510.05755 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, S. Mondal, D. Nogradi and C. H. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 94, 091501 (2016) [arXiv:1607.06121 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Hasenfratz and D. Schaich, arXiv:1610.10004 [hep-lat]. [Google Scholar]
  9. Z. Fodor, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Hasenfratz, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. DeGrand, Y. Shamir and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 82, 054503 (2010) [arXiv:1006.0707 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. W. Chiu, arXiv:1603.08854 [hep-lat]. [Google Scholar]
  13. T. W. Chiu, PoS LATTICE 2016, 228 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Aoki et al. [LatKMI Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 1, 014508 (2017) [arXiv:1610.07011 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Rinaldi, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Appelquist et al. [LSD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 90, no. 11, 114502 (2014) [arXiv:1405.4752 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Appelquist et al., Phys. Rev. D 93, no. 11, 114514 (2016) [arXiv:1601.04027 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Fleming, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  19. R. C. Brower, A. Hasenfratz, C. Rebbi, E. Weinberg and O. Witzel, Phys. Rev. D 93, no. 7, 075028 (2016) [arXiv:1512.02576 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Hasenfratz, C. Rebbi and O. Witzel, arXiv:1609.01401 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Rebbi, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D 94, no. 5, 054502 (2016) [arXiv:1603.04575 [hepph]]. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, PoS LATTICE 2016, 205 (2016) [arXiv:1610.01752 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Kasai, K. i. Okumura and H. Suzuki, arXiv:1609.02264 [hep-lat]. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D 95, no. 1, 016003 (2017) [arXiv:1611.04275 [hepph]]. [Google Scholar]
  26. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai, JHEP 1707, 035 (2017) [arXiv:1702.04410 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Gasbarro, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Leino, J. Rantaharju, T. Rantalaiho, K. Rummukainen, J. M. Suorsa and K. Tuominen, Phys. Rev. D 95, no. 11, 114516 (2017) [arXiv:1701.04666 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  29. G. Bergner, P. Giudice, I. Montvay, G. Münster and S. Piemonte, arXiv:1610.01576 [hep-lat]. [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Rantaharju, C. Pica and F. Sannino, Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 1, 014512 (2017) [arXiv:1704.03977 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  31. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, C. Schroeder and C. H. Wong, Phys. Lett. B 718, 657 (2012) [arXiv:1209.0391 [hep-lat]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. C. H. Wong, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  33. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, S. Mondal, D. Nogradi and C. H. Wong, JHEP 1509, 039 (2015) [arXiv:1506.06599 [hep-lat]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Holland, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  35. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, S. Mondal, D. Nogradi and C. H. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 94, no. 1, 014503 (2016) [arXiv:1601.03302 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Kuti, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Hansen, V. Drach and C. Pica, arXiv:1705.11010 [hep-lat]. [Google Scholar]
  38. C. Pica, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  39. H. Georgi and D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Lett. B 145, 216 (1984). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. J. Dugan, H. Georgi and D. B. Kaplan, Nucl. Phys. B 254, 299 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D 91, no. 9, 094506 (2015) [arXiv:1502.00390 [hepph]]. [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, arXiv:1707.06033 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  43. T. A. DeGrand, M. Golterman, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 94, no. 5, 054501 (2016) [arXiv:1606.02695 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  44. R. Contino, arXiv:1005.4269 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  45. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki and J. Serra, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2766 (2014) [arXiv:1401.2457 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  46. G. Panico and A. Wulzer, Lect. Notes Phys. 913, 1 (2016) [arXiv:1506.01961 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. G. Ferretti and D. Karateev, JHEP 1403, 077 (2014) [arXiv:1312.5330 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. D. B. Kaplan, Nucl. Phys. B 365, 259 (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. G. Ferretti, JHEP 1406, 142 (2014) [arXiv:1404.7137 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. W. I. Jay, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  51. V. Ayyar, these proceedings [Google Scholar]
  52. D. Hackett, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  53. T. A. DeGrand, D. Hackett, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir and B. Svetitsky, PoS LATTICE 2016, 219 (2016) [arXiv:1610.06465 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  54. J. Barnard, T. Gherghetta and T. S. Ray, JHEP 1402, 002 (2014) [arXiv:1311.6562 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. B. Lucini, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  56. D. Vadacchino, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  57. E. Bennett, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  58. J. W. Lee, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  59. L. Del Debbio, C. Englert and R. Zwicky, arXiv:1703.06064 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.