EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 175 (2018) EPJ Web Conf., 175 (2018) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 175, 2018
35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 8
Section 4 Chiral Symmetry
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817504002
Published online 26 March 2018
  1. Zhaojun Bai, Gark Fahey, and Gene Golub. “Some large-scale matrix computation problems”. In: Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 74.1-2 (1996), pp. 71–89. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tom Banks and A Casher. “Chiral symmetry breaking in confining theories”. In: Nuclear Physics B 169.1 (1980), pp. 103–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Paulo F Bedaque et al. “Broken symmetries from minimally doubled fermions”. In: Physics Letters B 662.5 (2008), pp. 449–455. [Google Scholar]
  4. Artan Borići. “PoS (LATTICE 2008) 231 Minimally Doubled Fermion Revival”. In: (2008). [Google Scholar]
  5. Stefano Capitani et al. “Renormalization of minimally doubled fermions”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2010.9 (2010), p. 27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Krzysztof Cichy, Elena Garcia-Ramos, and Karl Jansen. “Chiral condensate from the twisted mass Dirac operator spectrum”. In: Journal of high energy physics 2013.10 (2013), p. 175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Michael Creutz. “Four-dimensional graphene and chiral fermions”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2008.04 (2008), p. 017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. PH Damgaard et al. “The microscopic spectral density of the QCD Dirac operator”. In: Nuclear Physics B 547.1-2 (1999), pp. 305–328. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. H Fukaya et al. “Determination of the chiral condensate from QCD Dirac spectrum on the lattice”. In: Physical review D 83.7 (2011), p. 074501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leonardo Giusti and Martin Lüscher. “Chiral symmetry breaking and the Banks-Casher relation in lattice QCD with Wilson quarks”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2009.03 (2009), p. 013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gene H Golub and Charles F Van Loan. Matrix computations. Vol. 3. JHU Press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  12. Luuk H Karsten. “Lattice fermions in euclidean space-time”. In: Physics Letters B 104.4 (1981), pp. 315–319. [Google Scholar]
  13. John Kogut and Leonard Susskind. “Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories”. In: Physical Review D 11.2 (1975), p. 395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cornelius Lanczos. “Solution of systems of linear equations by minimized iterations”. In: J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards 49.1 (1952), pp. 33–53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yoichiro Nambu and Giovanni Jona-Lasinio. “Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. I”. In: Physical Review 122.1 (1961), p. 345. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Herbert Neuberger. “Overlap lattice Dirac operator and dynamical fermions”. In: Physical Review D 60.6 (1999), p. 065006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Holger Bech Nielsen and Masao Ninomiya. “Absence of neutrinos on a lattice:(I). Proof by homotopy theory”. In: Nuclear Physics B 185.1 (1981), pp. 20–40. [Google Scholar]
  18. JC Osborn, D Toublan, and JJM Verbaarschot. “From chiral random matrix theory to chiral perturbation theory”. In: Nuclear Physics B 540.1-2 (1999), pp. 317–344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Andrei V Smilga and J Stern. “On the spectral density of Euclidean Dirac operator in QCD”. In: Physics Letters B 318.3 (1993), pp. 531–536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Frank Wilczek. “Lattice fermions”. In: Physical review letters 59.21 (1987), p. 2397. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kenneth G Wilson. “Confinement of quarks”. In: Physical Review D 10.8 (1974), p. 2445. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.