Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 175, 2018
35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017)
Article Number 11022
Number of page(s) 8
Section 11 Theoretical Developments
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817511022
Published online 26 March 2018
  1. G. Parisi, Phys. Lett. 131B, 393 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.R. Klauder, Phys. Rev. A29, 2036 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Nakazato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 77, 20 (1987) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Okano, L. Schulke, B. Zheng, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 111, 313 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Aarts, E. Seiler, I.O. Stamatescu, Phys. Rev. D81, 054508 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Ambjorn, M. Flensburg, C. Peterson, Nuc. Phys. B 275, 375 (1986) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Bloch, J. Mahr, S. Schmalzbauer (2015), arXiv:1508.05252 [Google Scholar]
  8. R.W. Haymaker, J. Wosiek, Phys. Rev. D 37, 969 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Sinclair, Complex Langevin Simulations of QCD at Finite Density – Progress Report, in Proceedings, 35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017): Granada, Spain, to appear in EPJ Web Conf. [Google Scholar]
  10. L.L. Salcedo, Phys. Lett. B 305, 125 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Aarts, F.A. James, E. Seiler, I.O. Stamatescu, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1756 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Nishimura, S. Shimasaki (2015), arXiv:1504.08359 [Google Scholar]
  13. L.L. Salcedo, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114505 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Seiler, D. Sexty, I.O. Stamatescu, Phys. Lett. B 723, 213 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Seiler, Status of the Complex Langevin Method, in Proceedings, 35th Internation l Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017): Granada, Spain, to appear in EPJ Web Conf. [Google Scholar]
  16. L.L. Salcedo, J. Math. Phys. 38, 1710 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Weingarten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 240201 (2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. L.L. Salcedo, J. Phys. A 40, 9399 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Wosiek, JHEP 04, 146 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  20. L.L. Salcedo, Phys. Rev. D 94, 074503 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. L.L. Salcedo, Representation of complex probabilities and complex Gibbs sampling, in Proceedings, 35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017): Granada, Spain, to appear in EPJ Web Conf. [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Wosiek, Positive Representations of a Class of Complex, Periodic Measures, in Proceedings, 35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017): Granada, Spain, to appear in EPJ Web Conf. [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Wyrzykowski, Matching Conditions in Complex Langevin Approach, in Proceedings, 35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017): Granada, Spain, to appear in EPJ Web Conf. [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Seiler, J. Wosiek (2017), arXiv:1702.06012 [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Reed, S. Barry, Methods of Modern Mathemathical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness (Academic Press, 1975) [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Ambjorn, S.K. Yang, Phys. Lett. B165, 140 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.