Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 175, 2018
35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017)
Article Number 13028
Number of page(s) 8
Section 13 Weak Decays and Matrix Elements
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817513028
Published online 26 March 2018
  1. P. Gambino, K.J. Healey, S. Turczyk, Phys. Lett. B763, 60 (2016), 1606.06174 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Alberti, P. Gambino, K.J. Healey, S. Nandi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 061802 (2015), 1411.6560 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Gambino, A. Melis, S. Simula, Phys. Rev. D96, 014511 (2017), 1704.06105 [Google Scholar]
  4. I.I.Y. Bigi, M.A. Shifman, N. Uraltsev, A.I. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D56, 4017 (1997), hep-ph/9704245 [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Gambino, T. Mannel, N. Uraltsev, JHEP 10, 169 (2012), 1206.2296 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A.S. Kronfeld, J.N. Simone, Phys. Lett. B490, 228 (2000), [Erratum: Phys. Lett.B495,441(2000)], hep-ph/0006345 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Blossier et al. (ETM), JHEP 04, 049 (2010), 0909.3187 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. I.I.Y. Bigi, M.A. Shifman, N.G. Uraltsev, A.I. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D50, 2234 (1994), hep-ph/9402360 [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Beneke, V.M. Braun, Nucl. Phys. B426, 301 (1994), hep-ph/9402364 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M.E. Luke, A.V. Manohar, M.J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D51,4924 (1995), hep-ph/9407407 [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Martinelli, C.T. Sachrajda, Phys. Lett. B354, 423 (1995), hep-ph/9502352 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Czarnecki, K. Melnikov, N. Uraltsev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3189 (1998), hep-ph/9708372 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Carrasco et al. (European Twisted Mass), Nucl. Phys. B887, 19 (2014), 1403.4504 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. K.G. Chetyrkin, A. Retey, Nucl. Phys. B583, 3 (2000), hep-ph/9910332 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Gambino, JHEP 09, 055 (2011), 1107.3100 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Gusken, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 17, 361 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Bussone et al. (ETM), Phys. Rev. D93, 114505 (2016), 1603.04306 [Google Scholar]
  19. V. Lubicz, A. Melis, S. Simula (ETM), Phys. Rev. D96, 034524 (2017), 1707.04529 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Aoki et al., Eur. Phys. J. C77, 112 (2017), 1607.00299 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. A.G. Grozin, P. Marquard, J.H. Piclum, M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B789, 277 (2008), 0707.1388 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.