Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 176, 2018
The 28th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 28)
Article Number 01032
Number of page(s) 4
Section Recent advances in lidar technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817601032
Published online 13 April 2018
  1. Twomey S., 1977: Influence of pollution on shortwave albedo of clouds, J. Atmos. Sci. 34, 1149–1152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim, D., Cheong, H., Kim, Y., Volkov, S., and Lee, J., 2010: Optical depth and multiple scattering depolarization in liquid clouds, Opt. Rev., 17, 507–512, doi:10.1007/s10043-010-0091-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Roy G., Bissonnette L., Bastille C., and Valle´ e G., 1999: Retrieval of droplet-size density distribution from multiple-field-ofview cross-polarized lidar signals: theory and experimental validation. Aplied Optics Vol. 38, No. 24 [Google Scholar]
  4. Malinka, A. V. and Zege, E. P.,2007: Possibilities of warm cloud microstructure profiling with multiple-field-of-view Raman lidar, Appl. Optics, 46, 8419–8427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmidt, J., Wandinger, U., and Malinka, A, 2013: Dual-field-of-view Raman lidar measurements for the retrieval of cloud microphysical properties, Appl. Optics, 52, 2235–2247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Donovan D. P, H. Klein Baltink, J. S. Henzing, S. R. de Roode, and A. P. Siebesma, 2015: A depolarisation lidarbased method for the determination of liquid-cloud microphysical properties. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schmidt J., Ansmann A., Bühl J., Baars Wandinger U., Müller D, and Malinka A. V, 2013: Dual-FOV Raman and Doppler lidar studies of aerosol-cloud interactions: Simultaneous profiling of aerosols, warmcloud properties, and vertical wind, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 5512–5527 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schmidt J., Ansmann A., Bühl J, and Wandinger U., 2015: Strong aerosol–cloud interaction in altocumulus during updraft periods: lidar observations over central Europe. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hu, Y., Vaughan, M., Liu, Z., Lin, B., Yang, P., Flittner, D., Hunt, B., Kuehn, R., Huang, J., Wu, D., Rodier, S., Powell, K., Trepte, C., and Winker, D., 2007: The depolarization – attenuated backscatter relation: CALIPSO lidar measurements vs. theory, Opt. Express, 15, 5327–5332. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Malinka A. V., Zege E. P., 2003: Analytical modeling of Raman lidar return, including multiple scattering. Applied optics vol 42, Nro 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reichardt J, Baumgart R. and McGee T. J., 2003: Three-signal method for accurate measurements of depolarization ratio with lidar. Applied optics, col. 42, No 24 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.