Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 176, 2018
The 28th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 28)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 4
Section Spaceborne-Airborne lidar missions
Published online 13 April 2018
  1. Vaughan, M., A. Garnier, J. Tackett, M. Avery, S. Young, J. Kar, B. Getzewich, A. Omar, Z. Liu, K.-P. Lee, X. Cai, S. Zeng, Y. Hu, J. Lambeth, R. Ryan, B. Magill, S. Rodier, T. Murray, K. Beaumont, P. Detweiler, P. Lucker, J. Pelon, D. Winker, and C. Trepte, “Introducing CALIPSO’s Version 4 Level 2 Lidar Data Products,“ in International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC), Bucharest, Romania, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rogers, R. R., C. A. Hostetler, J. W. Hair, R. A. Ferrare, Z. Liu, M. D. Obland, D. B. Harper, A. L. Cook, K. A. Powell, M. A. Vaughan, and D. M. Winker, “Assessment of the CALIPSO Lidar 532 nm attenuated backscatter calibration using the NASA LaRC airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar,“ Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 11, pp. 1295-1311, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu, Y., M. Vaughan, Z. Liu, K. Powell, and S. Rodier, “Retrieving Optical Depths and Lidar Ratios for Transparent Layers Above Opaque Water Clouds From CALIPSO Lidar Measurements,“ IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 4, pp. 523-526, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, Z., D. Winker, A. Omar, M. Vaughan, J. Kar, C. Trepte, Y. Hu, and G. Schuster, “Evaluation of CALIOP 532 nm AOD over opaque water clouds,“ Atmospheric chemistry and physics discussions, vol. 14, pp. 23583-23637, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tesche, M., A. Ansmann, D. Muller, D. Althausen, I. Mattis, B. Heese, V. Freudenthaler, M. Wiegner, M. Esselborn, G. Pisani, and P. Knippertz, “Vertical profiling of Saharan dust with Raman lidars and airborne HSRL in southern Morocco during SAMUM,“ Tellus B, vol. 61, pp. 144-164, Feb 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rogers, R. R., M. A. Vaughan, C. A. Hostetler, S. P. Burton, R. A. Ferrare, S. A. Young, J. W. Hair, M. D. Obland, D. B. Harper, A. L. Cook, and D. M. Winker, “Looking through the haze: evaluating the CALIPSO level 2 aerosol optical depth using airborne high spectral resolution lidar data,“ Atmos. Meas. Tech., vol. 7, pp. 4317-4340, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Papagiannopoulos, N., L. Mona, L. Alados-Arboledas, V. Amiridis, H. Baars, I. Binietoglou, D. Bortoli, G. D'Amico, A. Giunta, J. L. Guerrero-Rascado, A. Schwarz, S. Pereira, N. Spinelli, U. Wandinger, X. Wang, and G. Pappalardo, “CALIPSO climatological products: evaluation and suggestions from EARLINET,“ Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 16, pp. 2341-2357, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Muller, D., A. Ansmann, I. Mattis, M. Tesche, U. Wandinger, D. Althausen, and G. Pisani, “Aerosol-type-dependent lidar ratios observed with Raman lidar,“ J. Geophys. Res., vol. 112, Aug 17 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sayer, A. M., A. Smirnov, N. C. Hsu, and B. N. Holben, “A pure marine aerosol model, for use in remote sensing applications,“ Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 117, pp. n/a-n/a, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Josset, D., J. Pelon, Y. Hu, R. Rogers, Z. Liu, A. Omar, M. Vaughan, P. w. Zhai, and I. Team, “Global scale lidar ratio retrieval over the ocean,“ presented at the 26th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 26), Porto Heli, Greece, 2012. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.