Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 176, 2018
The 28th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 28)
Article Number 05022
Number of page(s) 4
Section Lidars applications in atmospheric structure and composition: Aerosols, clouds, trace gases
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817605022
Published online 13 April 2018
  1. Chuvieco, E., et al., 2016: A new global burned area product for climate assessment of fire impacts, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25, pp. 619-629. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jolly, W. M., et al., 2015: Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979-2013, Nature Communications, 6:7537, doi: 10.1038/ncomms8537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. IPCC, 2014: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Climate Change 2013: Synthesis Report. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wotawa, G., 2001: Interannual variability of summertime CO concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere explained by boreal forest fires in North America and Russia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4575- 4578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Amiridis, V., et al., 2009: Optical characteristics of biomass burning aerosols over Southeastern Europe determined from UV-Raman lidar measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2431-2440. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bougiatioti, A., et al., 2014: Processing of biomassburning aerosol in the eastern Mediterranean during summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4793-4807. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. European Environment Agency (EEA), Air Quality in Europe, 2016 Report, EEA Report No 28/2016, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Paraskevopoulou, D. et al., 2016: Long term characterization of organic and elemental carbon in the PM2.5 fraction: the case of Athens, Greece, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 13313-13325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bougiatioti, A., et al., 2016: Biomass-burning impact on CCN number, hygroscopicity and cloud formation during summertime in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7389-7409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nicolae, D., et al., 2013: Characterization of fresh and aged biomass burning events using multiwavelength Raman lidar and mass spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 2956-2965. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wandinger, U., et al., 2002: Optical and microphysical characterization of biomass burning and industrial-pollution aerosols from multi-wavelength lidar and aircraft measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 107, D21, 8125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Balis, d., et al., 2003: Raman lidar and sun photometric measurements of aerosol optical properties over Thessaloniki, Greece, during a biomass burning episode, Atmos. Environ., 37, 4529-4538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Müller, D., et al., 2005: Raman lidar observations of aged Siberian and Canadian forest fire smoke in the free troposphere over Germany, in 2003: microphysical particle characterization, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D17201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gross, S., et al., 2013: Aerosol classification by airborne high spectral resolution lidar observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2487-2505. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Giannakaki, E., et al., 2016: Optical and microphysical characterization of aerosol layers over S. Africa by means of multi-wavelength depolarization and Raman lidar measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8109-8123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Müller, D., et al., 2007: Aerosol-type-dependent lidar ratios observed with Raman lidar, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mamouri et al., 2012: Multi-wavelength Raman lidar, sun photometric and aircraft measurements in combination with inversion models for the estimation of the aerosol optical and physico-chemical properties over Athens, Greece, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1793- 1808. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Papayannis, A., et al., 2012: ARIADNE: The Greek Lidar Network, Proc. 26th International Laser Radar Conference, Porto Heli, Greece, 349-352. [Google Scholar]
  19. d'Amico, G., et al., 2012: EARLINET Single Calculus Chain for automatic lidar data processing: First tests on optical products, Proc. 26th International Laser Radar Conference, Porto Heli, Greece, 331-334. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.