Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 176, 2018
The 28th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 28)
Article Number 05024
Number of page(s) 4
Section Lidars applications in atmospheric structure and composition: Aerosols, clouds, trace gases
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817605024
Published online 13 April 2018
  1. Yamanouchi T., et al. 2005: Arctic Study of Tropospheric Aerosol and Radiation (ASTAR) 2000: Arctic haze case study, Tellus 57B, 141–152 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Markowicz, K.M, C. Ritter, J. Lisok, P. Makuch, I.S. Stachlewska, D. Cappelletti, M. Mazzola, M.T. Chilinski, 2017: Vertical variability of aerosol singlescattering albedo and black carbon concentration based on in-situ and remote sensing techniques during iAREA campaigns in Ny-Ålesund, Atmos. Environ., vol. 164, pp. 431-447, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stachlewska I.S., et al. 2016: Near-range receiver unit of NeXT generation PollyXT used with Koldeway Aerosol Raman Lidar in Arctic, ILRC27, New York [Google Scholar]
  4. Engelmann R., et al. 2016: The automated multiwavelength Raman polarization and water-vapor lidar PollyXT: the neXT generation, Atmos. Meas. Tech. 9, 1767-1784 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ritter C., Neuber R., Schulz A., Markowicz K.M., Stachlewska I.S., Lisok J., Makuch P., Pakszys P., Markuszewski P., Rozwadowska A., Petelski T., Zielinski T., Becaglie S., Traversie R., Udistie R., Gausaf M., 2016: 2014 iAREA campaign on aerosol in Spitsbergen – Part 2: Optical properties from Ramanlidar and in-situ observations at Ny-Ålesund, Atmos. Environ. Vol.141 1-19 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.053 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baars H., et al. 2016: An overview of the first decade of PollyNET: an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5111-5137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Böckmann C., et al. 2017: Arctic biomass burning aerosol event microphysical property retrieval, ILRC28, Bucharest, (this issue). [Google Scholar]
  8. Müller D., et al. 2016: Microphysical particle properties derived from inversion algorithms developed in EARLINET, Atmos. Meas. Tech. 9, 5007-5035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Samaras S., et al. 2015: Using Raman-lidar-based regularized microphysical retrievals and aerosol mass spectrometer for characterization of biomass burning aerosols, J.Comput.Phys. 299,156-174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stachlewska I.S. and Ritter C. 2010: On retrieval of lidar extinction profiles using Two-Stream and Raman techniques, Atmos.Chem.Phys., 10, 2813-2824 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.