Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 181, 2018
International Conference on Exotic Atoms and Related Topics - EXA2017
Article Number 01030
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818101030
Published online 25 June 2018
  1. The MoEDAL experiment web page: http://moedal.web.cern.ch/ [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Pinfold et al. [MoEDAL Collaboration], “Technical Design Report of the MoEDAL Experiment,” CERN-LHCC-2009-006, MoEDAL-TDR-001, and references therein. [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Evans and P. Bryant, JINST 3, S08001 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. De Roeck, A. Katre, P. Mermod, D. Milstead and T. Sloan, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1985 (2012). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Fairbairn, A. C. Kraan, D. A. Milstead, T. Sjostrand, P. Z. Skands and T. Sloan, Phys. Rept. 438, 1 (2007); S. Burdin, M. Fairbairn, P. Mermod, D. Milstead, J. Pinfold, T. Sloan and W. Taylor, Phys. Rept. 582, 1 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Acharya et al. [MoEDAL Collaboration], Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1430050 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 133, 60 (1931). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. A. M. Dirac, Phys. Rev. 74, 817 (1948). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 79, 276 (1974); A. M. Polyakov, JETP Lett. 20, 194 (1974) [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 430 (1974)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Julia and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2227 (1975); Y. Nambu, Nucl. Phys. B 130, 505 (1977); E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 86B, 283 (1979); G. Lazarides, M. Magg and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. 97B, 87 (1980); R. d. Sorkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 87 (1983); D. J. Gross and M. J. Perry, Nucl. Phys. B 226, 29 (1983); J. S. Schwinger, Science 165, 757 (1969); J. Preskill, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 34, 461 (1984); A. Achucarro and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rept. 327, 347 (2000) [Phys. Rept. 327, 427 (2000)]; T. W. Kephart, C. A. Lee and Q. Shafi, JHEP 0701, 088 (2007); D. G. Pak, P. M. Zhang and L. P. Zou, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, no. 27, 1550164 (2015); A. Rajantie, JHEP 0601, 088 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Vento and V. S. Mantovani, “On the magnetic monopole mass,” arXiv:1306.4213 [hep-ph] (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. M. Cho and D. Maison, Phys. Lett. B 391, 360 (1997); W. S. Bae and Y. M. Cho, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 46, 791 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. M. Cho, K. Kimm and J. H. Yoon, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31, no. 09, 1650053 (2016); Phys. Lett. B 761, 203 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and T. You, Phys. Lett. B 756, 29 (2016); J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, JHEP 1407, 036 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Barriola and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 341 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. K. Drukier and S. Nussinov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 102 (1982). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. P. O. Mazur and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. D 44, 1317 (1991); N. E. Mavromatos and J. Papavassiliou, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, no. 1, 68 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. N. E. Mavromatos and S. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. D 95, no. 10, 104025 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. B. Zeldovich and M. Y. Khlopov, Phys. Lett. 79B, 239 (1978). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. T. Hill, Nucl. Phys. B 224, 469 (1983). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. V. K. Dubrovich, Grav. Cosmol. Suppl. 8N1, 122 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Rajantie, Contemp. Phys. 53, 195 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Rajantie, Phys. Today 69, no. 10, 40 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, C. A. Garcia Canal and V. Vento, Eur. Phys. J. C 56, 87 (2008); Eur. Phys. J. C 62, 587 (2009). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, C. A. G. Canal, V. A. Mitsou and V. Vento, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127, 60 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, C. A. G. Canal, V. A. Mitsou and V. Vento, “Can the 750 GeV enhancement be a signal of light magnetic monopoles?,” arXiv:1607.05592 [hep-ph] (2016). [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Kalliokoski, J. W. Lämsä, M. Mieskolainen and R. Orava, “Turning the LHC Ring into a New Physics Search Machine,” arXiv:1604.05778 [hep-ex] (2016). [Google Scholar]
  28. A. A. Alves, Jr. et al. [LHCb Collaboration], JINST 3, S08005 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  29. M. D. Joergensen, A. De Roeck, H.-P. Hachler, A. Hirt, A. Katre, P. Mermod, D. Milstead and T. Sloan, “Searching for magnetic monopoles trapped in accelerator material at the Large Hadron Collider,” arXiv:1206.6793 [physics.ins-det] (2012). [Google Scholar]
  30. A. De Roeck, H. P. Hächler, A. M. Hirt, M.-D. Joergensen, A. Katre, P. Mermod, D. Milstead and T. Sloan, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2212 (2012). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Sopczak et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62, 3225 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Acharya et al. [MoEDAL Collaboration], JHEP 1608, 067 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. B. Acharya et al. [MoEDAL Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 061801 (2017). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. O. Gould and A. Rajantie, arXiv:1705.07052 [hep-ph] (2017). [Google Scholar]
  35. G. Aad et al. [ATLAS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 261803 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. G. Aad et al. [ATLAS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 93, 052009 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Patrizii and M. Spurio, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65, 279 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. H. Goldberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1419 (1983) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 099905 (2009)]; J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive and M. Srednicki, Nucl. Phys. B 238, 453 (1984). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. V. A. Mitsou, PoS PLANCK 2015, 085 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  40. J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive, Y. Santoso and V. C. Spanos, Phys. Lett. B 565, 176 (2003). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. O. Buchmueller et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2243 (2012); Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2922 (2014). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  42. T. Jittoh, J. Sato, T. Shimomura and M. Yamanaka, Phys. Rev. D 73, 055009 (2006) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D 87, 019901 (2013)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. S. Kaneko, J. Sato, T. Shimomura, O. Vives and M. Yamanaka, Phys. Rev. D 78, 116013 (2008) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D 87, 039904 (2013)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive and Y. Santoso, JHEP 0810, 005 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. J. L. Diaz-Cruz, J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive and Y. Santoso, JHEP 0705, 003 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. K. Hamaguchi, M. M. Nojiri and A. de Roeck, JHEP 0703, 046 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. J. L. Feng, S. Iwamoto, Y. Shadmi and S. Tarem, JHEP 1512, 166 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  48. N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, JHEP 0506, 073 (2005); G. F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Nucl. Phys. B 699, 65 (2004) Erratum: [Nucl. Phys. B 706, 487 (2005)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. J. Mamuzic, N. E .Mavromatos, V. A. Mitsou, J. L. Pinfold, R. Ruiz de Austri, K. Sakurai, O. Vives, “Long-lived charged supersymmetric particles and MoEDAL,” in preparation. [Google Scholar]
  50. G. Shiu and L. T.Wang, Phys. Rev. D 69, 126007 (2004); J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and D. V. Nanopoulos, Gen. Rel. Grav. 32, 943 (2000); Phys. Lett. B 665, 412 (2008); J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and M. Westmuckett, Phys. Rev. D 70, 044036 (2004); ibid. 71, 106006 (2005); N. E. Mavromatos, S. Sarkar and A. Vergou, Phys. Lett. B 696, 300 (2011); N. E. Mavromatos, V. A. Mitsou, S. Sarkar and A. Vergou, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1956 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. V. A. Mitsou [MoEDAL Collaboration], EPJ Web Conf. 95, 04042 (2015); PoS EPS-HEP2015, 109 (2015); PoS CORFU 2016, 028 (2017); N. E. Mavromatos and V. A. Mitsou [MoEDAL Collaboration], EPJ Web Conf. 164, 04001 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.