Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 184, 2018
9th European Summer School on Experimental Nuclear Astrophysics
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Session 1
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818401002
Published online 29 June 2018
  1. C.A. Bertulani and T. Kajino, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 89, 56 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Komatsu, et al., Ap. J. 192, 18 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. P.A.R. Ade, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. The ALEPH Collaboration, The DELPHI Collaboration, The L3 Collaboration, The OPAL Collaboration, The SLD Collaboration, The LEP Electroweak Working Group, The SLD Electroweak and Heavy Flavor Groups, Phys. Reports 427, 257 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Patrignani, et al. (Particle Data Group), Chinese Phys. C 40, 100001 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Spite and F. Spite, Nature 297, 483 (1982); F. Spite and M. Spite, A&A 115, 357 (1982). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Aoki, et al., Ap. J. 698, 1803 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Sbordone, et al., A&A 522, A26 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Coc, et al., Ap. J. 744, 158 (2012). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R.G. Pizzone, et al., Ap. J. 786, 112 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C.A. Bertulani, Comput. Phys. Commun. 156, 123 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. M. Mukhamedzhanov, Shubhchintak, and C.A. Bertulani, Phys. Rev. C 93,045805 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Anders et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 042501 (2014). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Asplund, D. L. Lambert, P. E. Nissen, F. Primas and V. V. Smith, Ap. J. 644, 229 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Lind, J. Melendez, M. Asplund, R. Collet and Z. Magic, A&A 554, A96 (2013). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. R.V. Wagoner, Ap. J. Suppl. Ser. 18, 247 (1969). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Kawano, “Let’s Go: Early Universe. Primordial Nucleosynthesis: The Computer Way”; NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS): Hampton, VA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  18. Y.I. Izotov and T.X. Thuan, Ap. J. Lett. 710, L67 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E.E. Salpeter, Aust. J. Phys. 7, 373 (1954); E.E. Salpeter and H.M. Van Horn, Ap. J. 155, 183 (1969). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Wang, C.A. Bertulani, and A.B. Balantekin, Phys. Rev. C 83, 018801 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Spitaleri, et. al., Phys. Lett. B 755, 275 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Signe Riemer-Sorensen and Espen Sem Jenssen, Universe 2, 44 (2017). doi:10.3390/universe3020044. [Google Scholar]
  23. R.J. Cooke, M. Pettini, and C.C. Steidel, arXiv:1710.02730. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. M. Bania, R. T. Rood, D. S. Balser, Nature 415, 54 (2002). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Broggini, et al., JCAP 6, 30 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S.Q. Hou, et al. 2015, Phys. Rev. C 91, 055802 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Barbagallo, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 152701 (2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Kawabata, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 052701 (2017). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. L. Lamia, et. al., Ap. J. 850, 175 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Hartos, et. al., to be published. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. L. Feng, arXiv:1003.0904 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  32. G. Bertone, D. Hopper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Bertone, Nature 468, 389 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. T.D. Li and C. N Yang, Phys. Rev. 104, 254 (1956). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Y. Kobzarev, L. Okun, I. Pomeranchuk, Yad. Fiz. 3, 1154 (1966). [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Pavsic, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 9, 229 (1974). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Foot, H. Lew, R. Volkas, Phys. Lett. B 272, 67 (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. E. Akhmedov, Z. Berezhiani, G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3013 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. O. Oliveira, et al., arXiv:1108.2723 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  40. C.A. Bertulani, et. al., AIP Proc. 1498, 134 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  41. O. Oliveira, et al., Braz. J. Phys. 46, 721 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Z.G. Berezhiani, A.D. Dolgov, R.N. Mohapatra, Phys. Lett. B375, 26 (1996). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  43. K.A. Olive (Particle Data Group - Review of Particle Physics), Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  44. C.A. Bertulani, V. Challa, J.J. He, S.Q. Hou, Ravinder Kumar, arXiv:1704.07803. [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Rényi, Proc. of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, p. 547, 561 (1960). [Google Scholar]
  46. C. Tsallis, J. Stat. Phys. 52, 479 (1988). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  47. M. Gell-Mann and C. Tsallis, eds., “Nonextensive Entropy-Interdisciplinary Applications, (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004). For a regularly updated bibliography see URL: http://tsallis.cat.cbpf.br/biblio.htm [Google Scholar]
  48. C.A. Bertulani, J. Fuqua and M.S. Hussein, Ap. J. 767, 67 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Lissia and P. Quarati, Europhys. News 36, 211 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Haubold and D. Kumar, Astroparticle Phys. 29,70 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. S. Degl’Innocenti et al, Phys. Lett. B 441, 291 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Coraddu, et al., Braz. J. Phys. 29, 153 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. S.Q. Hou, et. al., Ap. J. 834, 165 (2017). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. E. Aver, K.A. Olive, E.D. Skillman, JCAP 5, 003 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. K.A. Olive, P. Petitjean, E. Vangioni, J. Silk, MNRAS 426, 1427 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Susanna Kohler, AAS-NOVA, “Fixing the Big Bang Theory’s Lithium Problem", 15 February (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.