Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 208, 2019
ISVHECRI 2018 - XX International Symposium on Very High Energy Cosmic Ray Interactions
Article Number 13002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Space and Balloon Experiments
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201920813002
Published online 10 May 2019
  1. For cosmic rays physics reviews see: I. A. Grenier et al., Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 199 (2015); [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Blasi, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 70 (2013); [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A.W. Strong et al., Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 285 (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. For the BESS experiment see: K. Abe et al., Astrophys. J. 822, 65 (2016); [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Shikaze et al., Astropart. Phys. 28, 154 (2007); [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Haino et al., Phys. Lett. B 594, 35 (2004); [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Sanuki et al., Astrophys. J. 545, 1135 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  8. For the PaMeLa experiment see: O. Adriani et al., Astrophys. J. 791, 93 (2014); [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Adriani, et al., Astrophys. J. 765, 91 (2013); [Google Scholar]
  10. O. Adriani, et al., Science 332, 69 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  11. For the CREAM-I experiment see: Y. S. Yoon et al., Astrophys. J. 728, 122 (2011); [Google Scholar]
  12. H. S. Ahn et al., Astrop. Phys. 30, 133 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. For the ATIC-02 experiment see: A. D. Panov et al., Bull. Russian Acad. Sci. 73, 564 (2009); [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. D. Panov et al., Proc. of the 30th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Mérida, 2, 3 (2008); [Google Scholar]
  15. data were extracted using D. Maurin et al., Astron. Astrophys. 569, A32 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. J. J. Engelmann et al., Astron. Astrophys. 233, 96 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  17. S. P. Swordy, et al., Astrophys. J. 349, 625 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Buckley, et al., Astrophys. J. 429, 736 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  19. For the CREAM-II experiment see: H. S. Ahn et al., Astrophys. J. 715, 1400 (2010); [Google Scholar]
  20. H. S. Ahn et al., Astrophys. J. 714, 89 (2010); [Google Scholar]
  21. H. S. Ahn et al., Astrophys. J. 707, 593 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  22. For the TRACER experiment see: A. Obermeier et al., Astrophys. J. 742, 14 (2011); [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Ave, et al., Astrophys. J. 678, 262 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Gahbauer et al., Astrophys. J. 607, 333 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Juliusson, Astrophys. J. 191, 331 (1974). [Google Scholar]
  26. C. D. Orth et al., Astrophys. J. 226, 1147 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  27. W. R. Webber et al., Proc. of 16th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Tokyo, 12, 51 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  28. J. A. Lezniak et al., Astrophys. J. 223, 676 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  29. R. C. Maehl et al., Astrophys. Space Sci. 47, 163 (1977). [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Simon et al., Astrophys. J. 239, 712 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Aguilar et al., Astrophys. J. 724, 329 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Aguilar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 171103 (2015). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Aguilar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 211101 (2015). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Aguilar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 231102 (2016). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Aguilar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251101 (2017). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Aguilar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 021101 (2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Aguilar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 051103 (2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. P. L. Biermann et al., Astrophys. J. 725, 184 (2010); [Google Scholar]
  39. Y. Ohira and K. Ioka, Astrophys. J. Lett. 729, L13 (2011); [Google Scholar]
  40. Q. Yuan et al., Proc. of the 32nd Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Beijing, 6, 222 (2011); [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Thoudam and J. R. Hörandel, Mon. Not. Royal Astron. Soc. 435, 2532 (2013). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Thoudam and J. R. Hörandel, Astron. Astrophys. 567, A33 (2014); [Google Scholar]
  43. P. Blasi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 061101 (2012); [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. N. Tomassetti, Phys. Rev. D 92, 081301(R) (2015); [Google Scholar]
  45. A. E. Vladimirov et al., Astrophys. J. 752, 68 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  46. A. Kounine, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 21 1230005 (2012); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. S. Rosier-Lees, in Proc. of Astrop. Phys. TEVPA/IDM, Amsterdam, 2014 (unpublished); [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Ting, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 243-244, 12 (2013); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. S.-C. Lee, in Proc. of the 20th Int. Conf. on Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY 2012), Beijing, 2012 (unpublished); [Google Scholar]
  50. M. Aguilar, in Proc. of the XL Int. Meeting on Fundamental Phys., Centro de Ciencias de Benasque Pedro Pascual, 2012 (unpublished); [Google Scholar]
  51. S. Schael, in Proc. of the 10th Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe, Los Angeles, 2012 (unpublished); [Google Scholar]
  52. B. Bertucci, Proc. Sci., EPS-HEP, (2011) 67; [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Incagli, AIP Conf. Proc. 1223, 43 (2010); [Google Scholar]
  54. R. Battiston, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 588, 227 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. K. Lübelsmeyer et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 654, 639 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. B. Alpat et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 613, 207 (2010); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. G. Ambrosi et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 869C, 29 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. V. Bindi et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 743, 22 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. J. Alcaraz et al., Phys. Lett. B 484, 10 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  60. C. C. Finlay et al., Geophys. J. Int. 183, 1216 (2010); [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. E. Thébault et al., Earth Planets Space 67, 79 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.