Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2019
23rd International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2018)
Article Number 05014
Number of page(s) 7
Section T5 - Software development
Published online 17 September 2019
  1. I. Bediaga et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “ Framework TDR for the LHCb Upgrade : Technical Design Report ” CERN-LHCC-2012-007, LHCb-TDR-12. [Google Scholar]
  2. The LHCb Collaboration, CERN, “ Upgrade Software and Computing ” CERN-LHCC-2018-007. LHCB-TDR-017,, [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Couturier, E. Kiagias and S. B. Lohn, “Systematic profiling to monitor and specify the software refactoring process of the LHCb experiment,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 513 (2014) 052020. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/513/5/052020 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Mazurov, B. Couturier, D. Popov and N. Farley, “Microservices for systematic profiling and monitoring of the refactoring process at the LHCb experiment,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898 (2017) no.7, 072037. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/7/072037 [Google Scholar]
  5. Docker [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  6. Docker Compose [software] [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Clemencic and B. Couturier, “LHCb Build and Deployment Infrastructure for run 2,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 664 (2015) no.6, 062008. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/664/6/062008 [Google Scholar]
  8. S.-G. Chitic, “ LHCb continuous integration and deployment system: a message based approach ”, CHEP2018 [Google Scholar]
  9. Python [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bash [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jenkins [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  12. RabbitMQ [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  13. JSON [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Antcheva et al. “ROOT: A C++ framework for petabyte data storage, statistical analysis and visualization,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 2499 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.08.005 [arXiv:1508.07749 []]. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Tsaregorodtsev et al. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 119 (2008) 062048. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/119/6/062048 [Google Scholar]
  16. MySQL [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  17. Django [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  18. AngularJS [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mattermost [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hadoop [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  21. [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  22. [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  23. HDFS [software],[accessed2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  24. Apache Parquet [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  25. Z. Baranowski, L. Canali, R. Toebbicke, J. Hrivnac and D. Barberis, “A study of data representation in Hadoop to optimize data storage and search performance for the ATLAS EventIndex,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898 (2017) no.6, 062020. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/6/062020 [Google Scholar]
  26. Apache Spark [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  27. Apache Zeppelin [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  28. Danilo Piparo and Enric Tejedor and Pere Mato and Luca Mascetti and Jakub Mosci-cki and Massimo Lamanna “SWAN: A service for interactive analysis in the cloud”, Future Generation Computer Systems volume 78, 1071–1078, 2018, issn: 0167-739X, doi:, [Google Scholar]
  29. Viktor Khristenko and Jim Pivarski,“ diana-hep/spark-root: Release 0.1.14 ”, doi:10.5281/zenodo.1034230, [Google Scholar]
  30. WebHDFS [software],[accessed2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  31. PySpark [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  32. Matplotlib [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jupyer [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gauss [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Adinolfi et al. [LHCb RICH Group], Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2431 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2431-9 [arXiv:1211.6759 [physics.ins-det]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gitlab [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Currie, “ Monitoring LHCb Trigger developments using nightly integration tests and a new interactive web UI ”, CHEP2018 [Google Scholar]
  38. D. Popov, “ Testing and verification of the LHCb Simulation ”, CHEP2018 [Google Scholar]
  39. Perf [software], [accessed 2018–10–19] [Google Scholar]
  40. Eulisse and Tuura, “IgProf profiling tool”, Proceedings CHEP04, Computing in High Energy Physics [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.