Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 222, 2019
The XXIV International Workshop “High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory” (QFTHEP 2019)
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Theory
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201922203007
Published online 19 November 2019
  1. F. Jegerlehner, The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Springer Tracts Mod.Phys. 274 (Springer International Publishing AG, 2017), 693 p. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114025 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey, and H. Mueller, Science 360, 191 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Davoudiasl and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 98, 075011 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. V. Kotikov and S. Teber, Phys. Part. Nucl. 50, 1 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Kinoshita, B. Nizic, and Y. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. D 41, 593 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Phys. Rev. D 73, 013003 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 73, 416 (1948) and 76, 790 (1949). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Petermann, Helv. Phys. Acta 30, 407 (1957). [Google Scholar]
  10. C. M. Sommerfield, Phys. Rev. 107, 328 (1957). [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Laporta and E. Remiddi, Phys. Lett. B 379, 283 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Laporta, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1085, no. 2, 022004 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. H. H. Elend, Phys. Letts. 20, 684 (1966); Errata: 21, 720 (1966). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Li, R. Mendel and M. A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1723 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Czarnecki and M. Skrzypek, Phys. Lett. B 449, 354 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Friot, D. Greynat and E. De Rafael, Phys. Lett. B 628, 73 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Friot and D. Greynat, J. Math. Phys. 53, 023508 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Laporta, Nuovo Cim. A 106, 675 (1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Laporta, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1138, 012001 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Laporta, Phys. Lett. B 312, 495 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  21. J. P. Aguilar, D. Greynat and E. de Rafael, Phys. Rev. D 77, 093010 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Laporta, Phys. Lett. B 772, 232 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard and M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B 879, 1 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard, A. Smirnov, V. Smirnov and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. D 93, 053017 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  25. P. A. Baikov, A. Maier and P. Marquard, Nucl. Phys. B 877, 647 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Marquard, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, M. Steinhauser and D. Wellmann, EPJ Web Conf. 218, 01004 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. L. Laursen and M. A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2478 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  28. E. E. Boos and A. I. Davydychev, Theor. Math. Phys. 89, 1052 (1991) [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 89, 56 (1991)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ph. Flajolet, X. Gourdon and Ph. Dumas, Theor. Comp. Science 144, 3 (1995). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Tanabashi et al., [Particle Data Group], Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 010001 (2018) and 2019 update. [Google Scholar]
  31. A. V. Sidorov, V. I. Lashkevich and O. P. Solovtsova, Nonlin. Phenom. Complex Syst. 21, 395 (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.