EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 225 (2020) EPJ Web Conf., 225 (2020) 04026 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 225, 2020
ANIMMA 2019 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 04026
Number of page(s) 5
Section Research Reactors
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202022504026
Published online 20 January 2020
  1. L. Yang, W. Zhan. A new concept for ADS spallation target: gravity-driven dense granular flow targets. Proceedings of the ThEC13 Conference, CERN, Globe of Science and Innovation, Geneva, Switzerland, 27–31 October 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26542-1_47 [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Xiao, H. Xu, S. Wang, HIAF and CiADS National Research Facilities: Progress and Prospect, Nucl Phys Rev, 34(3), 275–283 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  3. X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, F. Ma and et al., Neutron production for 250 MeV protons bombarding on thick grain-made tungsten target, EUR PHYS J A, 51(106) (2015). doi: 10.1140/epja/i2015-15106-0 [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Ju, X. Zhang, F. Ma et al., The production of residual radionuclides by a 250MeV proton beam, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 42(12) (2015). doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/42/12/125102 [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Li, X. Zhang, Y. Ju et al., Study of neutron spectra in a water bath from a Pb target irradiated by 250 MeV protons, CHINESE PHYS C, 39(4) (2015). doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/4/044001 [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Zhang, X. Zhang, F. Ma et al., Residual Nuclides Induced in Cu Target by a 250 MeV Proton Beam, CHINESE PHYS LETT, 32(4) (2015). doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/32/4/042501 [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Chen, F. Ma, X. Zhang et al., Spallation yield of neutrons produced in thick lead target bombarded with 250 MeV protons, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 342, 87~90 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2014.09.020 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Zhan, H. Xu, Advanced Fission Energy Program – ADS Transmutation System, CHINESE SCI BULL, 27(3): 375–381 (2012). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3045.2012.03.017 [Google Scholar]
  9. A.C. Kahler, R.E. MacFarlane, R.D. Mosteller et al. ENDF/B–VII.1 neutron cross section data testing with critical assembly benchmarks and reactor experiments. NUCL DATA SHEETS, 112(12), 2997–3036 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Zhang, Z. Chen, Y. Nie et al., Measurement of leakage neutron spectra for Tungsten with D–T neutrons and validation of evaluated nuclear data, FUSION ENG DES, 92, 41–45 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Zhang, Y. Nie, J. Ren et al., Benchmarking of JEFF–3.2, FENDL–3.0 and TENDL–2014 evaluated data for tungsten with 14.8 MeV neutrons, NUCL SCI TECH, 28:27 (2017). doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0192-0 [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Seidel, R. Eichin, U. Fischer et al. Benchmark experiments to validate the nuclear data of tungsten, FUSION ENG DES, 81, 1211–1217 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.09.050 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Batistoni, M. Angelone, et al. Neutron–nuclear data benchmark for copper and tungsten by slab assembly transmission experiments with D–T, FUSION ENG DES, 58–59, 617–621 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0920-3796(01)00518-X [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Murata, T. Nishio, L. Petrizzi et al. Neutronics benchmark experiment on tungsten, J NUCL MATER, 329–333, 683–686 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.191 [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Cabellos, Processing of the JEFF–3.2T3 Cross Section Library with the NJOY Code System into Various Formats for Testing Purposes (2013). JEFF Meeting, Spain, November 27–28, 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321731952 [Google Scholar]
  16. M.B. Chadwick, P. Oblozinsky, M. Herman at al., ENDF/B–VII.0: next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology. NUCL DATA SHEETS 107, 2931–3060 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  17. M.B. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Oblozinsky at al., ENDF/B–VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. NUCL DATA SHEETS 112: 2887–2996 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002. [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Ge, Z. Zhao, H. Xia et al., The updated version of Chinese evaluated nuclear data library (CENDL–3.1). J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 59, 1052 (2011). doi: 10.1051/ndata:07570 [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Shibata, O. Iwamoto, T. Nakagawa et al., JENDL–4.0: a new library for innovative nuclear energy systems. J. Kor. Phys. Soc., 59(23), 1046 (2011). doi: 10.3938/jkps.59.1046 [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Koning, R. Forrest, M. Kellett et al., JEFF Report 21: the JEFF–3.1 Nuclear Data Library (OECD, 2006). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267362554 [Google Scholar]
  21. Q. Zhu, Q. Zhou, S. Liang et al., VENUS–II ADS Zero Power Reactor in CIAE, Proceedings of the Reactor Physics Asia Conference, Chengdu, China, 24–25 August 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Hu, R. Wang, X. Liang et al., Method and Data Processing for HTR–10 Physics Experiment, Nucl Power Eng, 23(1), 8–11 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Khorsandi, Z. Nasr, R. Salimi et al., Heavy Water Zero Power Reactor (HWZPR) mixed core first criticality, calculation and experiments. PROG NUCL ENERG, 85, 613–616 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.08.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Wei, G. Long, Z. Qi el al. Measurement of tungsten reactivity worth on VENUS-II light water reactor and validation of evaluated nuclear data. PROG NUCL ENERG, 108, 81–88 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.05.002 M.K. Jaradat, V. Radulovic, C.J. Park et al., Verification of MCNP6 model of the Jordan Research and Training Reactor (JRTR) for calculations of neutronic parameters, ANN NUCL ENERGY, 96, 96–103 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2016.06.00 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.