Fragmentation analysis of 88Mo* compound nucleus in view of different decay mechanisms

Neha Grover; Bhaktima Thakur; Manoj K. Sharma

doi:10.1051/epjconf/202023203004

All issues

Volume 232 (2020)

EPJ Web Conf., 232 (2020) 03004

References

Open Access

Issue		EPJ Web Conf. Volume 232, 2020 Heavy Ion Accelerator Symposium (HIAS 2019)


Article Number		03004
Number of page(s)		5
Section		Nuclear Reactions
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023203004
Published online		06 April 2020

S. J. Sanders, D. G. Kovar, B. B. Back et al., Phys. Rev. C 40, 2091 (1989); S. J. Sanders, B. B. Back, R. V. F. Janssens et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, R1901 (1990). [Google Scholar]
C. Beck, B. Djerroud, B. Heuseh et al., Z. Phys. A 334, 521 (1989). [Google Scholar]
N. Grover, K. Sharma, and M. K. Sharma, Eur. Phys. J. A 53: 239 (2017). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
G. Kaur, N. Grover, K. Sandhu et al., Nucl. Phys. A 927, 232-248 (2014). [Google Scholar]
R. K. Gupta, M. Balasubramaniam, R. Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 014601 (2005). [Google Scholar]
S. Valdre´, S. Piantelli, G. Casini et al., Phys. Rev. C 93, 034617 (2016). [Google Scholar]
J. Marhun and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 548 (1974). [Google Scholar]
N. J. Davidson, S. S. Hsiao, J. Markram et al., Nucl. Phys. A 570, 61c (1994). [Google Scholar]
B. B. Singh, M. K. Sharma, and R. K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 77, 054613 (2008). [Google Scholar]
G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, C. Thiboult, Nucl. Phys. A 729, 337 (2003); G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 595, 4 (1995). [Google Scholar]
W. Myers, W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. 81, 1 (1966). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P. Möller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers et al., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185 (1995). [Google Scholar]
G. Royer and J. Mignen, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 18, 1781 (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

[1] S. J. Sanders, D. G. Kovar, B. B. Back et al., Phys. Rev. C 40, 2091 (1989); S. J. Sanders, B. B. Back, R. V. F. Janssens et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, R1901 (1990). [Google Scholar]

[2] C. Beck, B. Djerroud, B. Heuseh et al., Z. Phys. A 334, 521 (1989). [Google Scholar]

[3] N. Grover, K. Sharma, and M. K. Sharma, Eur. Phys. J. A 53: 239 (2017). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

[4] G. Kaur, N. Grover, K. Sandhu et al., Nucl. Phys. A 927, 232-248 (2014). [Google Scholar]

[5] R. K. Gupta, M. Balasubramaniam, R. Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 014601 (2005). [Google Scholar]

[6] S. Valdre´, S. Piantelli, G. Casini et al., Phys. Rev. C 93, 034617 (2016). [Google Scholar]

[7] J. Marhun and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 548 (1974). [Google Scholar]

[8] N. J. Davidson, S. S. Hsiao, J. Markram et al., Nucl. Phys. A 570, 61c (1994). [Google Scholar]

[9] B. B. Singh, M. K. Sharma, and R. K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 77, 054613 (2008). [Google Scholar]

[10] G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, C. Thiboult, Nucl. Phys. A 729, 337 (2003); G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 595, 4 (1995). [Google Scholar]

[11] W. Myers, W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. 81, 1 (1966). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[12] P. Möller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers et al., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185 (1995). [Google Scholar]

[13] G. Royer and J. Mignen, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 18, 1781 (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]