Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 237, 2020
The 29th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 29)
Article Number 08022
Number of page(s) 4
Section Lidar Data Analysis and Models
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023708022
Published online 07 July 2020
  1. G. M. Krekov, M. M. Krekova, and V. S. Shamanaev, “Laser sensing of a subsurface oceanic layer. I. Effect of the atmosphere andwind-driven sea waves,” Appl Opt 37, 1589-1595 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. R. Gordon, “Interpretation of airborne oceanic lidar: effects of multiple scattering,” Applied Optics 21, 2996-3001 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Phillips and B. Koerber, “A Theoretical Study of an Airborne Laser Technique for determining Sea Water Turbidity,” Australian Journal of Physics 37, 75 (1984). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. B. L. Collister, R. C. Zimmerman, C. I. Sukenik, V. Hill, and W. M. Balch, “Remote sensing of optical characteristics and particle distributions of the upper ocean using shipboard lidar,” Remote Sensing of Environment 215, 85-96 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  5. R. E. Walker and J. W. Mclean, “Lidar equations for turbid media with pulse stretching,” Applied Optics 38, 2384-2397 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. V. I. Feygels, “Mathematical modeling of input signals for oceanographic lidar systems,” Proc Spie 5155, 30-39 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. A. Hostetler, M. J. Behrenfeld, Y. Hu, J. W. Hair, and J. A. Schulien, “Spaceborne Lidar in the Study of Marine Systems,” Annual Review of Marine Science 10(2017). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. H. Churnside, “Review of profiling oceanographic lidar,” Optical Engineering 53, 051405 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Wang, S. L. Jacques, and L. Zheng, MCML— Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues (Springer US, 1995), pp. 131-146. [Google Scholar]
  10. D. M. Winker, M. A. Vaughan, A. Omar, Y. Hu, A. Powell, Z. Liu, W. H. Hunt, and S. A. Young, “Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms,” Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology 26, 2310-2323 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.