Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 239, 2020
ND 2019: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
Article Number 05015
Number of page(s) 4
Section Fission Experiment and Theory
Published online 30 September 2020
  1. IAEA, Thorium fuel cycle-potential benefits and challenges, IAEA-TECDOC-1450. Austria, Vienna (2005) [Google Scholar]
  2. IAEA, Thorium based fuel options for the generation of electricity: developments in the 1990s, IAEA-TECDOC-1155. IAEA, Vienna (2000) [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Merle-Lucotte, D. Heuer et al., European Nuclear Conference, Brussels, Belgique (2007) [Google Scholar]
  4. S. David, A. Billebaud et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 443, 510 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Kerdraon, A. Billebaud et al., Prog. Nucl. Energy 42, 11 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y.Q. Shi, Nucl. Phys. Rev. 24, 151 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  7. C.Q. Liu, Z. Wei et al., Chinese Physics C 6, 064001 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Vives, F.J. Hambsch, H. Bax et al., Nucl. Phys. A 662, 63 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  9. C.M. Zoller, et al., Seminar on Fission Pont dOye III, Habayla-Neuve, Belgium 56, 28(1995) [Google Scholar]
  10. F.-J. Hambsch, F. Vives, P. Siegler et al., Nucl. Phys. A 679, 3 ( 2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A.I. Sergachev, N.P. Djachenko, A.M. Kovalev et al., Sov. J.Nucl. Energy 7, 475 (1968) [Google Scholar]
  12. N.I. Akimov, V.G. Vorobeva and V.N. Kabenin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 13, 31 (1971) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Pasca, A.V. Andreev, G.G. Adamian et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 32 (2018) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Hirose, K. Nishio, S. Tanaka et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 119, 222501 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K.H. Schmidt, B. Jurado, C. Amouroux, C. Schmitt, Nuclear Data Sheets 131, 107 (2016) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. A.J. Koning, S. Hilaire, S. Goriely, TALYS-1.8 User Manual (2015) [Google Scholar]
  17. D.M. Gorodisskiy, K.V. Kovalchuk et al., J. Korean Phys. Society 59, 919 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Wei, Z.E. Yao, C.L. Lan et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 305, 455 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  19., retrieved 8th December 2017 [Google Scholar]
  20. A.L. Prindle, D.H. Sission et al., Physical Review C 20, 1824 (1979) [Google Scholar]
  21. R.A. Sigg, M.V. Kantrlo et al., Physical Review C 27, 245 (1983) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.