Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 239, 2020
ND 2019: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
Article Number 11002
Number of page(s) 4
Section Evaluation Methodology
Published online 30 September 2020
  1. E. Bernard, R. Sakamoto, A. Kreter, M.F. Barthe, E. Autissier, P. Desgardin, H. Yamada, S. Garcia-Argote, G. Pieters, J. Chene, B. Rousseau, C. Grisolia, Tungsten as a plasma-facing material in fusion devices: impact of helium high-temperature irradiation on hydrogen retention and damages in the material, Physica Scripta T 170, 014023 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Pereslavtsev, U. Fischer, Evaluation of n+W cross section data up to 150 MeV neutron energy, AIP Conference Proceedings 769, 215 (2005); [Google Scholar]
  3. The Joint Evaluated Fission and Fu sion File. JEFF-3.3, [Google Scholar]
  4. A.J. Koning, S. Hilaire and M.C. Duijvestijn, TALYS-1.0, Proc. International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, April 22-27, 2007, Nice, France, editors O. Bersillon, F. Gunsing, E. Bauge, R. Jacqmin, and S. Leray, EDP Sciences, 2008, p. 211 [Google Scholar]
  5. A.J. Koning, S. Hilaire, M. Duijvestijn, TALYS-1.7, A nuclear reaction program, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NRG), May 7, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  6. A.Yu. Konobeyev, U. Fischer, A.J. Koning, P.E. Pereslavtsev, M. Blann, Implementation of the geometry dependent hybrid model in TALYS, J. Korean Physical Society 59, 935 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  7. A.Yu. Konobeyev, U. Fischer, P.E. Pereslavt-sev, A. Koning, M. Blann, Implementation of GDH model in TALYS-1.7 code, KIT Scientific Working Papers 45, 2016; [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Blann, Importance of the nuclear density distribution on pre-equilibrium decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 757 (1972) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Blann, H.K. Vonach, Global test of modified pre-compound decay models, Phys. Rev. C 28, 1475 (1983) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Blann, ALICE-91: Statistical model code system withfission competition, RSIC Code Package PSR-146, 1991 [Google Scholar]
  11. C.H.M. Broeders, A.Yu. Konobeyev, A.Yu. Korovin, V.P. Lunev, M. Blann, ALICE/ASH - Pre-compound and evaporation model code system for calculation of excitation functions, energy and angular distributions of emitted particles in nuclear reactions at intermediate energies, Report FZKA 7183, May, 2006, [Google Scholar]
  12. ENDF-6 formats manual, Report BNL-90365-2009 Rev.2, Ed. A. Trkov, M. Herman and D.A. Brown, October 24, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Raynal, ECIS-06: Code system to solve coupled differential equations arising in nuclear model calculations, RSICC PSR-227, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Hauser, H. Feshbach, The inelastic scattering of neutrons, Phys. Rev. 87, 366 (1952) [Google Scholar]
  15. A.V. Ignatyuk, G.N. Smirenkin, A.S. Tishin, Phenomenological description of the energy dependence of the level density parameter, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 21, 255 (1975) [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Gilbert, A.G.W. Cameron, A composite nuclear-level density formula with shell corrections, Can. J. Phys. 43, 1446 (1965) [Google Scholar]
  17. D.L. Smith, Covariance matrices for nuclear cross sections derived from nuclear model calculations, ANL/NDM-159, Argonne National Laboratory, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  18. A.J. Koning, D. Rochman, Modern nuclear data evaluation with the TALYS code system, Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 2841 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. A.J. Koning, TEFAL-1.9: Making nuclear data libraries using TALYS, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NRG), November 2017 [Google Scholar]
  20. Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data (EXFOR), [Google Scholar]
  21. A.Yu. Konobeyev, U. Fischer, P.E. Pereslavtsev, S.P. Simakov, Evaluated data files for neutron irradiation of 182W and 186W at energies up to 200 MeV, KIT Scientific Working Papers 108, 2019; [Google Scholar]
  22. A.Yu. Konobeyev, U. Fischer, P.E. Pereslavtsev, S.P. Simakov, Evaluated data files for n+ 180W and 183W irradiation at incident neutron energies up to 200 MeV, KIT Scientific Working Papers 123, 2019; [Google Scholar]
  23. D.E. Cullen, A. Trkov, Computational format C4, [Google Scholar]
  24. ENSDF: Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File Search and Retrieval, [Google Scholar]
  25. F.S. Dietrich, J.D. Anderson, R.W. Bauer, S.M. Grimes, R.W. Finlay, W.P. Abfalterer, F.B. Bateman, R.C. Haight, G.L. Morgan, E. Bauge, J.P. Delaroche, P. Romain, Importance of isovector effects in reproducing neutron total cross section differences in the W isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 67, 044606 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  26. V.S. Barashenkov, A. Polanski, Electronic Guide for Nuclear Cross-Sections, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Communication E2-94-417, JINR, Dubna, Russia, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  27. A.Yu. Konobeyev, U. Fischer, Complete gas production data library for nuclides from Mg to Bi at neutron incident energies up to 200 MeV, Report KIT SWP 36 (2015), [Google Scholar]
  28. A.Yu. Konobeyev, U. Fischer, Reference data for evaluation of gas production cross-sections in proton induced reactions at intermediate energies, KIT SR 7660 (2014), [Google Scholar]
  29. D.L. Smith, A Least-squares computational tool kit, ANL/NDM-128, Argonne National Laboratory, 1993 [Google Scholar]
  30. A.Yu. Konobeyev, U. Fischer, P.E. Pereslavtsev, Computational approach for evaluation of nuclear data including covariance information, J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 59, 923 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  31. The NJOY Nuclear data processing system, version 2016, [Google Scholar]
  32. ENDF-6 Checking and Utility Codes, [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Trkov, Program COVEIG, [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.