EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 241 (2020) EPJ Web Conf., 241 (2020) 01015 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 241, 2020
The 12th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons (NSTAR 2019)
Article Number 01015
Number of page(s) 8
Section Experiment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202024101015
Published online 22 September 2020
  1. A. D. Sakharov, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Phys. Fiz. 5, 32 (1967). [Google Scholar]
  2. C. A. Aidala et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 655 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Scherer and M. R. Schindler, Lect. Notes Phys. 830, 1 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 112001 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Pohl et al., Nature 466 (2010) 213; C. E. Carlson, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 82, 59 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Bezginov et al., Science 365, Issue 6457, 10071012 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Granados, S. Leupold and E. Perotti, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 17 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  8. 1.1. Bigi, A. I. Sanda, CP violation Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 9, Cambridge University Press (2000). [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Tanabashi etal., Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 108, 1645 (1957). [Google Scholar]
  11. The PANDA Collaboration, PANDA Technical Progress Report, FAIR-ESAC (2005). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Spataro et al., The PandaRoot framework for simu- lation,reconstruction and analysis, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 331, 032031 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Al-Turany et al., The FairRoot Framework, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 396, 022001 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Bran and F. Rademakers, ROOT - An Object Oriented Data Analysis Framework, Nucl. Inst. Meth. in Phys. Res. A 389, 81–86 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Johansson, Proceedings of LEAP 2002 95 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  16. P. D. Bames et al. Nucl. Phys. A 526, 575 (1991);P. D. Barnes et al. Phys. Rev. C 62, 055203 (2000);K. D. Paschke et al., Phys. Rev. C 74, 015206 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Kohno and W. Weise, Phys. Lett. B 179 15 (1986); H. R. Rubinstein and H. Snellman Phys. Lett. B 165 187 (1985); S. Furui and A. Faessler, Nucl. Phys. A 486 669 (1987); M. Burkardt and M. Dillig Phys. Rev. C 37 1362 (1988); M. A. Alberg et al. Z. Phys. A 331 207 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Tabakin and R. A. Eisenstein Phys. Rev. C 311857 (1985); M. Kohno and W. Weise, Phys. Lett. B. 179 15 (1985); P. La France et al. Phys. Lett. B 214 317 (1988); R. G. E. Timmermans et al. 1992 Phys. Rev. D 45 2288 (1992) ; J. Haidenbauer et al. Phys. Rev. C 46 2516(1992). [Google Scholar]
  19. P. G. Ortega et al. Phys. Lett. B. 696 352 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Klempt, F. Bradamante, A. Martin, J.-M. Richard, Phys. Rep. 368, p 119 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Musgrave and G. Petmezas, Nuovo Cim. 35, 735 (1965);C. Baltay et al., Phys. Rev. B 140, 1027 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Thom6, Multi-Strange and Charmed Antihyperon- Hyperon Physics for PANDA Ph. D. Thesis, Uppsala University (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. The PANDA collaboration, Physics Performance Report (2009). [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Grape, Studies of PWO Crystals and Simulations of the pp ^ AA, AS° Reactions for the PANDA experiment Ph.D. Thesis, Uppsala University (2009). [Google Scholar]
  25. W. Ikegami-Andersson, Exploring the Merits and Challenges of Hyperon Physics with PANDA at FAIR, PhD Thesis, Uppsala University (2020). [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Perez Andrade, Production of the lP hyperons in the PANDA experiment at FAIR, Master thesis, Uppsala University (2019). [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Becker et al., Nucl. Phys. B 141, 48 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  28. A. B. Kaidalov and P. E. Z. Volkovitsky, Phys. C 63 51 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Klempt and J. M. Richard, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82 1095 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  30. V. Crede and W. Roberts, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76 076301 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. J. M. M. Hall et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 132002 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 112001 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  33. J. Puetz, these proceedings (2019). [Google Scholar]
  34. V. Punjabi et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 79 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Pacetti et al., Phys. Rep. 550-551, 1 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. A. Belushkin et al., Phys. Rev. C 75 035202 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Z. Dubnickova et al., Nuovo Cim. A 109 241 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  38. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 76, 092006 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Dobbs et al., Phys. Lett. B 739, 90 (2014); S. Dobbs et al., Phys. Rev. D 96, 092004 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 032013 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 122003 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  42. G. Pakhlova et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 172001(2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 132001 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  44. J. Adamczewski-Musch et al., Phys. Rev. C 95, 065205 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  45. J. R. Batley et al., Phys. Lett. B 650, 1 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. J. Bernstein et al., Phys. Rev. 139, 1650 (1965);G. Feldman and T. Fulton, Nucl. Phys. 8, 106 (1958). [Google Scholar]
  47. G. Agakishiev et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 41, 243 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  48. J. Adamczewski-Musch et al., Proposal for experiments at SIS18 during FAIR Phase 0 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973); N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 (1963) 531. [Google Scholar]
  50. R. Aaij (LHCb collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 211803 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  51. R. Aaij (LHCb collaboration), Nature Phys. 13, 391 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  52. .L. Canetti et al., New J. Phys. 14, 095012 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  53. X.-G. He et al., Phys. Rev. D 61, 071701 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. J. Tandean et al., Phys. Rev. D 67, 056001 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. J. F. Donogue et al., Phys. Rev. D 74 3927 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  56. HyperCP Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 262001 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Nature Phys. 15, p. 631–634(2019). [Google Scholar]
  58. G. Faldt and A. Kupsc, Phys. Lett. B 772, 16 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. G. Faldt, Phys. Rev. D 97, 053002 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. G. Faldt and K. Schonning, Sequential hyperon decays in the reaction e+e- ^ S°£°, arXiv:1908.04157 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  61. P. Adlarson and A. Kupsc, CP symmetry tests in the cascade-anticascade decay of charmonium, arXiv:1908.03102 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  62. E. Perotti et al., Phys. Rev. D 99, 056008 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. K. D. Paschke et al., Phys. Rev. C 74,015206 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  64. K. Schonning and E. Thomé, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 556, 012007 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  65. E. Perotti, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1024 no.1, 012019 (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.