Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 245, 2020
24th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2019)
Article Number 04016
Number of page(s) 8
Section 4 - Data Organisation, Management and Access
Published online 16 November 2020
  1. FTS website, [Google Scholar]
  2. A. A. Ayllon et al, FTS3: New Data Movement Service For WLCG, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 513 032081 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Evans and P. Bryant, LHC Machine, JINST 3 S08001 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Bird, Computing for the Large Hadron Collider, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 61: 99-118 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Barisits, T. Beermann, F. Berghaus et al, Rucio: Scientific Data Management, Comput Softw Big Sci 3: 11 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Giffels, Y. Guo, V. Kuznetsov et al, The CMS Data Management System, J. Phys.:Conf. Ser. 513 042052 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S K Paterson and A Tsaregorodtsev, DIRAC optimized workload management, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 119 062040 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Campana et al, ESCAPE prototypes a Data Infrastructure for Open Science, EPJ Web of Conferences (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Kiryanov, A. A. Ayllon and O. Keeble, FTS3/WebFTS – A Powerful File Transfer Service for Scientific Communities, Procedia Computer Science 66 670-678 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Bernabeu et al, Experiences with http/WebDAV protocols for data access in high throughput computing, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 331 072003 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Allcock et al, The Globus Striped GridFTP Framework and Server, SC ’05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, Seattle, WA, USA, 2005, pp. 54-54, doi: 10.1109/SC.2005.72 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Dorigo et al, XROOTD a highly scalable architecture for data access, WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 4(4):348--353 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Abadie et al, Storage Resource Managers: Recent International Experience on Requirements and Multiple Co-Operating Implementations, 24th IEEE Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST 2007), San Diego, CA, 2007, pp. 4759, doi: 10.1109/MSST.2007.4367963 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. J. Peters and L. Janyst, Exabyte Scale Storage at CERN, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 331 052015 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Alvarez et al, DPM: Future Proof Storage, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 396 032015 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Carbone et al, Performance Studies of the StoRM Storage Resource Manager, Third IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science 2007), Bangalore, pp. 423-430 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Fuhrmann and V. Gülzow, dCache, Storage System for the Future, Euro-Par 2006 Parallel Processing. Euro-Par 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4128 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  18. G Lo Presti et al, CASTOR: A Distributed Storage Resource Facility for High Performance Data Processing at CERN, 24th IEEE Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST 2007), San Diego, CA, 2007, pp. 275-280 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Cano et al, CERN Tape Archive: production status, migration from CASTOR and new features, EPJ Web of Conferences (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Ceccanti et al, WLCG Authorisation; from X.509 to Tokens, EPJ Web of Conferences (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Forti et al, Modernizing Third-Party-Copy Transfers in WLCG, EPJ Web of Conferences (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Lassnig et al, Quality of Service (QoS) for cost-effective storage and improved performance, EPJ Web of Conferences (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Berzano et al, HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Data Organization, Management and Access (DOMA), arXiv:1812.00761 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. X. Zhao et al, The ATLAS Data Carousel Project, EPJ Web of Conferences (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Karavakis et al, Unified Monitoring Architecture for IT and Grid Services, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 898 092033 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. I. Foster and C. Kesselman, Globus: A Toolkit-Based Grid Architecture, The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, pp. 259-278, (1999) [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Birgisson et al, Macaroons: Cookies with Contextual Caveats for Decentralized Authorization in the Cloud, Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, Internet Society (2014) [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Withers, B. Bockelman et al, SciTokens: Capability-Based Secure Access to Remote Scientific Data, PEARC ’18: Proceedings of the Practice and Experience on Advanced Research Computing 24 pp. 1-8 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Fuhrmann et al, The eXtreme-DataCloud project solutions for data management services in distributed e-infrastructures, EPJ Web of Conferences (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  30. Cloud Data Management Interface (CDMI) website, [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.