Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 245, 2020
24th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2019)
Article Number 07031
Number of page(s) 7
Section 7 - Facilities, Clouds and Containers
Published online 16 November 2020
  1. P. Armstrong et. al., Cloudscheduler: a resource manager for distributed compute clouds, arXiv preprint arXiv:1007.0050 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Keahey, M. Tsugawa, A. Matsunaga, and J. Fortes, Sky computing, Internet Computing, IEEE, 13(5): 43–51, 2009, doi:10.1109/MIC.2009.94 [Google Scholar]
  3. R.P. Taylor et. al., Consolidation of cloud computing in ATLAS, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 898 x052008 (2017), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/5/052008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R.J. Sobie et. al., Utilizing clouds for Belle II J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 664 022037 (2015), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/664/2/022037 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. McNab et. al., Managing virtual machines with Vac and Vcycle, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 664 022031 (2015), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/664/2/022031 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A Tsaregorodtsev et. al., DIRAC Distributed Computing Services, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 513 032096 (2014), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/513/3/032096 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Grzymkowski et. al., Belle II public and private cloud management in VMDIRAC, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 664 022021 (2015), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/664/2/022021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Amoroso et. al., A modular (almost) automatic set-up for elastic multi-tenants cloud (micro) infrastructures, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 898 (2017) 082031, doi:10.1088/17426596/898/8/082031 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Bockelman et. al., Interfacing HTCondor-CE with OpenStack, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 898 092021 (2017), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/9/092021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Fransham et. al., Research computing in a distributed cloud environment, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 256 (2010) 012003, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/256/1/012003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Gable et. al., A batch system for HEP applications in a distributed IaaS cloud, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 331 062110 (2011), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/331/6/062010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Thain, T. Tannenbaum and M. Livny, Distributed computing in practice: the Condor experience, Concurrency Computat.: Pract. Exper. 2005; 17:323 (2005), doi:10.1002/cpe.938 [Google Scholar]
  13. MariaDB open-source relational database, [Google Scholar]
  14. Cloud_init: the standard for customizing cloud instances. [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Blomer et. al., Micro-CernVM: slashing the cost of building and deploying virtual machines, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 513 (2014) 032009, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/513/3/032009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Blomer et. al., New directions in the CernVM file system, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 898 062031 (2017), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/6/062031 [Google Scholar]
  17. I. Gable et. al., Dynamic web cache publishing for IaaS clouds using Shoal, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 513 032035 (2014), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/513/3/032035 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Squid is a caching proxy for the Web. [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Charpentier, Benchmarking worker nodes using LHCb productions and comparing with HEPSpec06, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 898 082011, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/8/082011 [Google Scholar]
  20. The Worldwide LHC Computing Grid, [Google Scholar]
  21. F.H. Barreiro Megino et. al., PanDA for ATLAS distributed computing in the next decade J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 898 052002 (2017), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/5/052002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dynafed The Dynamic Federation project. [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Furano, O. Keeble and L. Field, Dynamic federation of grid and cloud storage, Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. (2016) 13: 629. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Berghaus et. al., Federating distributed storage for clouds in ATLAS, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1085 032027 (2018). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1085/3/032027 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Ebert et. al., Using a dynamic data federation for running Belle II simulation applications in a distributed cloud environment, EPJ Web of Conferences 214, 04026 (2019). [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Berghaus et. al., The Dynafed data federator as grid site storage element,, CHEP 2019, Adelaide, Australia, proceedings in preparation. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.