EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 245 (2020) EPJ Web Conf., 245 (2020) 10002 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 245, 2020
24th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2019)
Article Number 10002
Number of page(s) 7
Section 10 - Crossover sessions from online, offline and exascale
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202024510002
Published online 16 November 2020
  1. CLICdp Collaboration, CLIC Collaboration, The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) 2018 Summary Report, https://doi.org/10.23731/CYRM-2018-002 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Mangano et al., FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1. Future Circular Collider (2018), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6904-3 [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Bambade et al., The international linear collider: A global project (2019), 1903.01629 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Super charm–tau factory, https://ctd.inp.nsk.su/c-tau/ [Google Scholar]
  5. Q. Luo, W. Gao, J. Lan, W. Li, D. Xu, Progress of Conceptual Study for the Accelerators of a 2-7GeV Super Tau Charm Facility at China (2019), https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-MOPRB031 [Google Scholar]
  6. J.P. Delahaye et al., Muon colliders (2019), 1901.06150, https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01629 [Google Scholar]
  7. Future collider software workshop (2019), https://agenda.infn.it/event/19047 [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Brun, F. Rademakers, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A389, 81 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Rademakers et al., root (2018), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.848818 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Allison et al., IEEE T. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506, 250 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Allison et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A835, 186 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  13. https://gitlab.cern.ch/CLHEP/CLHEP [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Frank, F. Gaede, M. Petric, A. Sailer, DD4hep (2018), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.592244 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Frank, F. Gaede, C. Grefe, P. Mato, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 513, 022010 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Sailer, M. Frank, F. Gaede, D. Hynds, S. Lu, N. Nikiforou, M. Petric, R. Simoniello, G.G. Voutsinas, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898, 042017 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Marshall, M. Thomson, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 439 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P.Z. Skands, JHEP 05, 026 (2006) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Gaede, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A559, 177 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. LHCb Collaboration, ATLAS Collaboration, Gaudi v33r0 (2019), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3660964 [Google Scholar]
  21. CMS Collaboration, cmssw (2017), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.292299 [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Brun, P. Buncic, F. Carminati, A. Morsch, F. Rademakers, K. Safarik, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A502, 339 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Salzburger, B. Schlag, C. Gumpert, F. Klimpel, H. Grasland, J. Hrdinka, M. Kiehn, N. Calace, P. Gessinger, R. Langenberg et al., Acts project: v0.15.00 (2020), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3626878 [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1896 (2012) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Dobbs, J.B. Hansen, Comput. Phys. Commun. 134, 41 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Gaede, T. Behnke, N. Graf, T. Johnson, LCIO — A persistency framework for linear collider simulation studies, in CHEP 2003 (La Jolla, California, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  27. F. Gaede, T. Behnke, R. Cassell, N. Graf, T. Johnson, H. Vogt, LCIO persistency and data model for LC simulation and reconstruction, in CHEP 2004 (Interlaken, Switzerland, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Chytracek, J. Mccormick, W. Pokorski, G. Santin, IEEE T. Nucl. Sci. 53, 2892 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. F. Gaede, B. Hegner, P. Mato, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898, 072039 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  30. B. Morgan, G.A. Stewart, J.C. Villanueva, H.A. Willett, Modern Software Stack Building for HEP (2019), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3598985 [Google Scholar]
  31. D. Arominski, J.J. Blaising, E. Brondolin, D. Dannheim, K. Elsener, F. Gaede, I. GarcíaGarcía, S. Green, D. Hynds, E. Leogrande et al., A detector for CLIC: main parameters and performance (2018), 1812-07337, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2649437 [Google Scholar]
  32. C. Helsens, V. Volkl, C. Neubuser, G. Ganis, J.C. Villanueva, A software framework for FCC studies: status and plans (2019), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 3599139 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.