EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 245 (2020) EPJ Web Conf., 245 (2020) 11006 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 245, 2020
24th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2019)
Article Number 11006
Number of page(s) 10
Section 11 - Plenary contributions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202024511006
Published online 16 November 2020
  1. G. Apollinari, O. Brüning, T. Nakamoto and L. Rossi, “High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC,” CERN Yellow Rep. (2015) no. 5, 1 doi:10.5170/CERN-2015-005.1 [arXiv:1705.08830 [physics.acc-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Tonazzo [DUNE Collaboration], “Status of DUNE,” SciPost Phys. Proc. 1 (2019) 043. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.1.043 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Chrysostomou, R. Bolton, G. R. Davis, “The square kilometre array: challenges of distributed operations and big data rates,” Proc. Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems VII; Volume 10704:1070419 (2018). doi:10.1117/12.2309554 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Barisits et al., “Rucio Scientific data management,” Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 3 (2019) no.1, 11 doi:10.1007/s41781-019-0026-3 [Google Scholar]
  5. ATLAS Collaboration, JINST 3 (2008) S08003 [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Svirin et al., “BigPanDA: PanDA Workload Management System and its Applications beyond ATLAS,” EPJ Web Conf. 214 (2019) 03050. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921403050 [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Stagni et al. [DIRAC Collaboration], “DIRAC in Large Particle Physics Experiments,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898 (2017) no.9, 092020. doi:10.1088/17426596/898/9/092020 [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Kuhr [Belle II Software Group], “Belle II at the Start of Data Taking,” EPJ Web Conf. 214 (2019) 09004. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921409004 [Google Scholar]
  9. CMS Collaboration, JINST 3 (2008) S08004 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Giffels, Y. Guo, V. Kuznetsov, N. Magini and T. Wildish, “The CMS Data Management System,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 513 (2014) 042052. doi:10.1088/17426596/513/4/042052 [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Iiyama, C. Paus and M. Goncharov, “Dynamo The dynamic data management system for the distributed CMS computing system,“ Slides, Contribution ID:328, CHEP 2016 Conference, San Francisco, October 8-14, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. A. Ayllon, M. Salichos, M. K. Simon and O. Keeble, “FTS3: New Data Movement Service For WLCG,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 513 (2014) 032081. doi:10.1088/17426596/513/3/032081 [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Kero et al., “EISCAT 3D: the next generation international atmosphere and geospace research radar,“ Proc. First NEO and Debris Detection Conference, Darmstadt, Germany, 22-24 January 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/10037/15341 [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Aasi et al., “Advanced LIGO,“ Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 074001 (2015). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Acernese et al., “Advanced Virgo Status,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1342 (2020) no.1, 012010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Apache Kafka, https://kafka.apache.org/, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Pordes et al., “The Open Science Grid,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 78 (2007) 012057. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/78/1/012057 [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Williams [IceCube Collaboration], “Status and prospects for the IceCube Neutrino Observatory,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 952 (2020) 161650. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.11.109 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nautilus Pacific Research Platform, http://pacificresearchplatform.org/nautilus/, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Thain, T. Tannenbaum and M. Livny, “Distributed Computing in Practice: The Condor Experience“ Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 17:2-4 (2005) 323 [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Buncic, C. Aguado Sanchez, J. Blomer, L. Franco, A. Harutyunian, P. Mato and Y. Yao, “CernVM: A virtual software appliance for LHC applications,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 219 (2010) 042003. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/219/4/042003 [Google Scholar]
  22. O. Andreassen, C. Charrondière and A. De Dios Fuente, “Monitoring Mixed-Language Applications with Elastic Search, Logstash and Kibana (ELK),” doi:10.18429/JACoW-ICALEPCS2015-WEPGF041 [Google Scholar]
  23. ESCAPE European Science Cluster of Astronomy & Particle physics ESFRI research infrastructures, https://projectescape.eu/, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Aprile et al., “Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.111302 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Ahlin et al., “The XENON1T Data Distribution and Processing Scheme,” EPJ Web Conf. 214 (2019) 03015 doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921403015 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nicola Tomassetti, “AMS-02 in space: physics results, overview, and challenges,” Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 265-266 (2015) 245-247 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2015.06.063 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.