Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 9
Section Monte Carlo Transport
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. G. Truchet, et al., Computing adjoint-weighted kinetics parameters in TRIPOLI-4® by the iterated fission probability method, Annals of Nuclear Energy 85 (2015) 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Werner, et al., Mcnp6. 2 release notes, Tech. rep., Tech. Rep. LA-UR-18-20808, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Leppänen, et al., Calculation of effective point kinetics parameters in the serpent 2 monte carlo code, Annals of Nuclear Energy 65 (2014) 272–279. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2013.10.032. [Google Scholar]
  4. E. P. Ficaro, D. K. Wehe, KENO-NR: A monte carlo code for simulating 252cf-source-driven noise measurements to determine subcriticality, Nuclear Science and Engineering 117 (3) (1994) 158–176. doi:10.13182/nse94-a28531. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Pozzi, et al., MCNPX-PoliMi for nuclear nonproliferation applications, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 694 (2012) 119–125. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2012.07.040. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Clarke, et al., Verification and validation of the MCNPX-PoliMi code for simulations of neutron multiplicity counting systems, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 700 (2013) 135–139. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2012.10.025. [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Rubbia, A high gain energy amplifier operated with fast neutrons, in: AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP, 1995. doi:10.1063/1.49069. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Talamo, et al., Advances in the computation of the sjöstrand, rossi, and feynman distributions, Progress in Nuclear Energy 101 (2017) 299–311. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.01.006. [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Pakari, et al., Kinetic parameter measurements in the crocus reactor using current mode instrumentation, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. [Google Scholar]
  10. O. Pakari, et al., Current mode neutron noise measurements in the zero power reactor crocus, in: EPJ Web of Conferences, Vol. 170, EDP Sciences, 2018, p. 04017. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Pázsit, L. Pál, Neutron Fluctuations: A Treatise on the Physics of Branching Processes, Elsevier, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. D. Spriggs, et al., Two-region kinetic model for reflected reactors, Annals of Nuclear Energy 24 (3) (1997) 205–250. [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Berglöf, et al., Auto-correlation and variance-to-mean measurements in a subcritical core obeying multiple alpha-modes, Annals of Nuclear Energy 38 (2) (2011) 194–202. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. R. Sheff, R. W. Albrecht, The space dependence of reactor noise i-theory, Nuclear Science and Engineering 24 (3) (1966) 246–259. [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Brun, et al., TRIPOLI-4®, CEA, EDF and AREVA reference monte carlo code, Annals of Nuclear Energy 82 (2015) 151–160. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.053. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Verbeke, et al., Fission reaction event yield algorithm FREYA 2.0.2, Computer Physics Communications 222 (2018) 263–266. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Verbeke, et al., Integration of FREYA into MCNP6. an improved fission chain modeling capability., Tech. rep., Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States) (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Verbeke, O. Petit, Stochastic analog neutron transport with TRIPOLI-4 and FREYA: Bayesian uncertainty quantification for neutron multiplicity counting, Nuclear Science and Engineering 183 (2) (2016) 214–228. [Google Scholar]
  19. O. Pakari, Experimental and numerical study of stochastic branching noise in nuclear reactors, Ph.D. thesis, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Zoia, et al., Monte carlo analysis of the CROCUS benchmark on kinetics parameters calculation, Annals of Nuclear Energy 96 (2016) 377–388. [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Demaziere, et al., Overview of the CORTEX project, in: International Conference Physor ’19, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  22. V. Lamirand, et al., The COLIBRI experimental program in the CROCUS reactor: characterization of the fuel rods oscillator, EPJ Web of Conferences 225 (2020) 04020. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202022504020. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Lamirand, et al., Neutron noise experiments in the AKR-2 and CROCUS reactors for the european project CORTEX, EPJ Web of Conferences 225 (2020) 04023. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202022504023. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. D. E. Cullen, et al., Static and dynamic criticality: are they different?, Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA (US). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.