Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 06029 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Advanced Modelling and Simulation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124706029 | |
| Published online | 22 February 2021 | |
- A. Barreau. “Burn-up Credit Criticality Benchmark.” Technical Report Phase, IID, OECDNEA (2006). [Google Scholar]
- A. Paszke, S. Gross, S. Chintala, G. Chanan, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, Z. Lin, A. Desmaison, L. Antiga, and A. Lerer. “Automatic differentiation in PyTorch.” NIPS (2017). [Google Scholar]
- R. S. at Al. “APOLLO2 Year 2010.” Nucl Eng and Technology, volume 42, pp. 474–499 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- U. Grundmann et al. “DYN3D version 3.2 - code for calculation of transients in light water reactors (LWR) with hexagonal or quadratic fuel elements - description of models and methods -.” Wissenschaftlich-Technische Berichte (2019). [Google Scholar]
- R. Zivanovic and P. Bokov. “Cross-section parameterization of the pebble bed modular reactor using the dimension-wise expansion model.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 37, pp. 1763–1773 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- D. Botes and P. M. Bokov. “Polynomial interpolation of few-group neutron cross sections on sparse grids.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 64, pp. 156 – 168 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- J. Dufek. “Building the nodal nuclear data dependences in a many-dimensional state-variable space.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 38(7), pp. 1569 – 1577 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- E. Szames, K. Ammar, D. Tomatis, and J. Martinez. “Few-group cross sections library by active learning with spline kernels.” Proceding of the conference: Physics of reactor conference, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2019). [Google Scholar]
- H. L. Thi et al. “Use cases of Tucker decomposition method for reconstruction of neutron macroscopic cross-sections.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 109, pp. 284 – 297 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- K. Hornik. “Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks.” Neural Networks, volume 4(2), pp. 251 – 257 (1991). [Google Scholar]
- S. Mirvakili, F. Faghihi, and H. Khalafi. “Developing a computational tool for predicting physical parameters of a typical VVER-1000 core based on artificial neural network.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 50, pp. 82 – 93 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- B. Leniau and et al. “A neural network approach for burn-up calculation and its application to the dynamic fuel cycle code CLASS.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 81, pp. 125 – 133 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- E. Szames. “FFANN for regression.” (2019). URL https://github.com/BetanSz/FFANN-for-scalar-regression. [Google Scholar]
- J. Nickolls, I. Buck, M. Garland, and K. Skadron. “Scalable Parallel Programming with CUDA.” Queue, volume 6(2), p. 4053 (2008). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.