Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 10015
Number of page(s) 9
Section Verification & Validation
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. M.R. Gilbert, J.-Ch. Sublet. “Differential dpa calculations with SPECTRA-PKA.” Journal of Nuclear Materials, (504), pp. 101–108 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  2. J.-Ch. Sublet et al. “FISPACT-II: an advanced simulation system for activation, transmutation and material modelling.” Nucl Data Sheets, volume 139, pp. 77–137 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Federici et al. “European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials.” Nuclear Fusion, volume 57, p. 092002 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. “Fusion decay heat validation, FISPACT-II & TENDL-2017, EAF2010, ENDF/B-VIII.0, JEFF-3.3, and IRDFF-1.05 nuclear data libraries. CCFE-R(18)002.” (2018). URL [Google Scholar]
  5. M.R. Gilbert, J.-Ch. Sublet. “Experimental decay-heat simulation-benchmark for 14 MeV neutrons & complex inventory analysis with FISPACT-II.” Nuclear Fusion, volume 59, p. 086045 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  6. L.W. Packer et al. “UK fusion technology experimental activities at the ASP 14 MeV neutron irradiation facility.” Fusion Engineering and Design, volume 87, pp. 662–666 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  7. L.W. Packer et al. “Activation of ITER materials in JET: nuclear characterisation experiments for the long-term irradiation station.” Nuclear fusion, volume 58, p. 096013 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. C.R. Nobs et al. “Neutron spectrum unfolding for the development of a novel neutron detector for fusion.” Fusion Engineering and Design, volume 146, Part B, pp. 2658–2662 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Meister et al. “Current status of the design of the ITER bolometer diagnostic.” Fusion engineering and design, volume 120, pp. 21–26 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Capote et al. “Updating and Extending the IRDF-2002 Dosimetry Library.” ASTM International, volume 9 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. “Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data (EXFOR).” (2019). URL [Google Scholar]
  12. “The European Activation File: EAF-2010 Decay Data Library. CCFE-R(10)02.” (2010). URL [Google Scholar]
  13. Suarez A. et al. “Neutronic analysis for bolometers in ITER.” Fusion Engineering and Design, volume 88, pp. 1395–1399 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. F.P. Orsitto et al. “Diagnostics and control for the steady state and pulsed tokamak DEMO.” Nuclear fusion, volume 56, p. 026009 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Luo et al. “Activation cross section and isomeric cross section ratios for the (n,2n) reaction on 153Eu.” Physical Review C, volume 96, p. 044617 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  16. L.W. Packer et al. “A comparison of oxide decay heat simulations and nuclear data libraries.” These proccedings (2020). [Google Scholar]
  17. M.J. Martin et al. “Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 152.” Nucl Data Sheets, volume 114, pp. 1497–1847 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. S.K. Basu, A.A. Sonzogni. “Nuclear Data Sheets for A=150.” Nucl Data Sheets, volume 114, pp. 435–660 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  19. D.A. Brown et al. “ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data.” Nuclear Data Sheets, (148), pp. 1–142 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  20. O. Cabellos et al. “Benchmarking and validation activities within JEFF project.” EPJ Web of Conferences, (146), p. 06004 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Xiaolong, Zh. Chunmei. “Nuclear Data Sheets for A=197.” Nucl Data Sheets, volume 104, pp. 283–426 (2005). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.