Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 10017
Number of page(s) 8
Section Verification & Validation
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. U. Rohde et al., “The reactor dynamics code DYN3D – models, validation and applications,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, vol. 89, pp. 170–190, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. T. J. Downar, Y. Xu, V. Seker, and N. Hudson, “PARCS v3.0 - U.S. NRC Core Neutronics Simulator. Theory Manual,” 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Fiorina, I. Clifford, M. Aufiero, and K. Mikityuk, “GeN-Foam: a novel OpenFOAM® based multi-physics solver for 2D/3D transient analysis of nuclear reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 294, pp. 24–37, Dec. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. B. Rothrock, “FFTF isothermal physics tests,” Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. D. Bess, “Evaluation of the Initial Isothermal Physics Measurements at the Fast Flux Test Facility, a Prototypic Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor,” in International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments, 2019th ed., NEA/NSC/DOC(2006)1, FFTF-LMFR-RESR-001, revision 2, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Leppänen, M. Pusa, T. Viitanen, V. Valtavirta, and T. Kaltiaisenaho, “The Serpent Monte Carlo code: Status, development and applications in 2013,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 82, pp. 142–150, Sep. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Nikitin and E. Fridman, “Modeling of the FFTF isothermal physics tests with the Serpent and DYN3D codes,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 132, pp. 679–685, Oct. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. B. Chadwick et al., “ENDF/B-VII.0: Next Generation Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology,” Nucl. Data Sheets, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 2931–3060, Dec. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Hebert, “Consistent technique for the pin-by-pin homogenization of a pressurized water reactor assembly,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 227–238, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Kavenoky, “The SPH Homogenization Method,” in A Specialists’ Meeting on Homogenization Methods in Reactor Physics, IAEA-TECDOC-231, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Nikitin, E. Fridman, and K. Mikityuk, “On the use of the SPH method in nodal diffusion analyses of SFR cores,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 85, pp. 544–551, Nov. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Fridman and E. Shwageraus, “Modeling of SFR cores with Serpent-DYN3D codes sequence,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 53, pp. 354–363, Mar. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Nikitin, E. Fridman, and K. Mikityuk, “Solution of the OECD/NEA neutronic SFR benchmark with Serpent-DYN3D and Serpent-PARCS code systems,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 75, pp. 492–497, Jan. 2015. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.