EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 247 (2021) EPJ Web Conf., 247 (2021) 18002 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 18002
Number of page(s) 11
Section Fusion Reactor Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124718002
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Classification of Radioactive Waste,” IAEA Safety Standards, General Safety Guide No. GDG-1, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. M.R. Gilbert, T. Eade, C. Bachmann, U. Fischer and N.P. Taylor, “Activation, decay heat, and waste classification studies of the European DEMO concept,” Nucl. Fusion, 57, 046015 14pp. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  3. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, “Technology Roadmap Update for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” Generation IV International Forum, January 2014. [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Federici, W. Biel, M.R. Gilbert, R. Kemp, N. Taylor, and R. Wenninger, “European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials,” Nucl. Fusion, 57, 092002 26pp. (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Los Alamos National Laboratory, “MCNP6TM User’s Manual Version 1.0”, LA-CP-13-00634, Rev. 0, May 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, “FISPACT-II User Manual”, UKAEA-R(18)001, February 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. A.J. Koning and D. Rochman, “Modern Nuclear Data Evaluation With The TALYS Code System”, Nuclear Data Sheets 113 (2012) 2841, December 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. LLW Repository Ltd. “Waste Acceptance Criteria – Low Level Waste Disposal”, WSC-WAC-LOW – version 5.0 Issue 1, July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Generation IV International Forum Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection Evaluation Methodology Working Group, “PR&PP Evaluation: ESFR Full System Case Study Final Report”, GIF/PRPPWG/2009/002, October 2009. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Bodi, “Development of a CAD model for the European Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor in view of using the thermal hydraulics code TRACE”, September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. “Reactor pressure vessel,” https://www.euronuclear.org/info/encyclopedia/r/reactor-pressure-vessel.htm [Google Scholar]
  12. T.K. Mitra, A. Pai and P. Kumar, “Challenges in Manufacture of PFBR Steam Generators,” Energy Procedia, 7, pp 317-322, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D.P. Thomas, “Neutronic Analysis of European Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor Using Monte Carlo, May 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Facchini, V. Giusti, R. Ciolini, K. Tucěk, D. Thomas and E. D’Agata, “Detailed neutronic study of the power evolution for the European Sodium Fast Reactor during a positive insertion of reactivity,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 313, pp 1-9, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Trkov, M. Herman and D. A. Brown: “ENDF-6 Formats Manual, Data Formats and Procedures for the Evaluated Nuclear Data File, ENDF/B-VI and ENDF/B-VII,” BNL-90365-2009, Rev.2, November 2011. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. B. Chadwick, et al. “ENDF/B-VII.0: Next Generation Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology”, Nuclear Data Sheets UCRL-JRNL-225066, October 2006. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, “Strategy Effective from April 2016,” SG/2016/53, March 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sublet J -Ch, Packer L W, Kopecky J, Forrest R A, Koning A J, and Rochman D A, “The European Activation File: EAF-2010 neutron-induced cross section library”, CCFE-R(10)05, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  19. M.R. Gilbert, J.-Ch. Sublet, R.A. Forrest, “Handbook of Activation, Transmutation, and Radiation Damage Properties of the Elements Simulated Using FISPACT-II & TENDL-2014, Magnetic Fusion Plants”, Tech. Rep. CCFE-R (15)26, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Fishwick and J. R. Anderson, “European Fast Reactor Waste Arisings”, Nuclear Assessments Committee, AEA Safety and Reliability, NAC(91)P18 Revision 1, January 1992. [Google Scholar]
  21. M.R. Gilbert, T. Eade, T. Rey, R. Vale, C. Bachmann, U. Fischer, and N.P. Taylor, “Waste implications from minor impurities in European DEMO materials,” Nucl. Fusion 59, 076015 15pp, May 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. ASTM Standard, “Standard Specification for Seamless Ferritic and Austenitic Alloy-Steel Boiler, Superheater, and Heat-Exchanger Tubes,” 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Office for Nuclear Regulation, “Review of the iron-based materials applicable for the fuel and core of future Sodium Fast Reactors (SFR),” Research Project ONR-RRR-088, September 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. N. Wright, “Creep of A508/533 Pressure Vessel Steel,” Idaho National Laboratory, INL/EXT-14-32811 Revision 0, August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Hishinuma, A. Kohyama, R. Klueh, D. Gelles, W. Dietz, and K. Ehrlich. “Current status and future R&D for reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic steels.” Journal of Nuclear Materials, 258-263, pp. 193 – 204,1998. [Google Scholar]
  26. “Eurofer Steel, Development to Full Code Qualification,” Procedia Engineering, 55, pp. 300-308, 2013. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.