Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 21008
Number of page(s) 8
Section CORTEX
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124721008
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. J. Thie, Power Reactor Noise, American Nuclear Society, Illinois, US (1981). [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Demazière, P. Vinai, M. Hursin, S. Kollias, J. Herb, “Overview of the CORTEX project,” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Reactors – Reactor Physics paving the way towards more efficient systems (PHYSOR2018), Cancun, Mexico, April 22-26, 2018 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. Almaraz Trillo Report, “Neutron noise status in Trillo NPP,” technical report CO-12/043, Spain (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Seidl, K. Kosowski, U. Schüler, L. Belblidia, “Review of the historic neutron noise behaviour in German KWU built PWRs,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, 85, pp. 668–675 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Viebach, C. Lange, N. Brent, M. Seidl, D. Hennig, A. Hurtado, “Simulation of low-frequency PWR neutron flux fluctuations,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, 117, Article 103039 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Chionis, A. Dokhane, H. Ferroukhi, G. Girardin, A. Pautz, “PWR Neutron noise phenomenology: Part I-Simulation of stochastic phenomena with SIMULATE-3K,” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Reactors – Reactor Physics paving the way towards more efficient systems (PHYSOR2018), Cancun, Mexico, April 22-26, pp. 1001–1012 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Chionis, A. Dokhane, H. Ferroukhi, G. Girardin, A. Pautz, “PWR Neutron noise phenomenology: Part II-Qualitative comparison against plant data,” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Reactors – Reactor Physics paving the way towards more efficient systems (PHYSOR2018), Cancun, Mexico, April 22-26, pp. 1013–1024 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Vidal-Ferrándiz, A. Carreño, D. Ginestar, C. Demaziére, G. Verdú, “Neutronic simulation of fuel assembly vibrations in a nuclear reactor,” Proceedings of the International Conference Mathematics & Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science & Engineering (M&C 2019), Portland, Oregon, August 25-29, 2019 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Verma, C. Demazière, P. Vinai, G. Ricciardi, R. Jacqmin, “Assessment of the neutron noise induced by stationary fuel assembly vibrations in a light water reactor,” Proceedings of the International Conference Mathematics & Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science & Engineering (M&C 2019), Portland, Oregon, August 25-29, 2019 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Ferroukhi, K. Hofer, J. M. Hollard, A. Vasiliev, M. A. Zimmermann, “Core Modelling and Analysis of the Swiss Nuclear Power Plants for Qualified R & D Applications,” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Reactors – Nuclear Power: A Sustainable Resource (PHYSOR2008), Interlaken, Switzerland, Sep 14-19, 41, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Chionis, A. Dokhane, L. Belblidia, M. Pecchia, G. Girardin, H. Ferroukhi, A. Pautz, “SIMULATE-3K analyses of neutron noise response to fuel assembly vibrations and thermal-hydraulics parameters fluctuations,” Proceedings of the International Conference Mathematics & Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science & Engineering (M&C 2017), Jeju, Korea, April 16-20, 2017 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Chionis, A. Dokhane, L. Belblidia, H. Ferroukhi, G. Girardin, A. Pautz, “Verification and Qualification of the Fuel Assembly Vibration Model in CASMO-5 and SIMULATE-3K,” Soon to be submitted, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  13. Kozlowski T., Downar T.J., “OECD/NEA and US NRC PWR MOX/UO2 core transient benchmark – Final Specifications – Revision 2,” NEA/NSC/DOC (2006) 20, D (2007). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.