Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 249, 2021
Powders & Grains 2021 – 9th International Conference on Micromechanics on Granular Media
Article Number 11005
Number of page(s) 4
Section Geomaterials
Published online 07 June 2021
  1. E. Kolb, V. Legué, M.B. Bogeat-Triboulot, Physical root–soil interactions. Phys. Biol. 14(6), 065004 (2017) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.A. Smethurst, D. Clarke, W. Powrie, Factors controlling the seasonal variation in soil water content and pore water pressures within a lightly vegetated clay slope. Géotechnique 62(5), 429-446 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  3. C.W.W. Ng, A.K. Leung, K.X. Woon, Effects of soil density on grass-induced suction distributions in compacted soil subjected to rainfall. Can. Geotech. J. 51(3), 311-321 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Fraccica, E.E. Romero Morales, T. Fourcaud, Multi-scale effects on the hydraulic behaviour of a root-permeated and compacted soil. In IS-Glasgow 2019–7th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (EDP Sciences, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.K. Leung, A. Garg, C.W.W. Ng, Effects of plant roots on soil-water retention and induced suction in vegetated soil. Eng. Geol. 193, 183-197 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. J.E. Aravena, M. Berli, T.A. Ghezzehei, S.W. Tyler, Effects of root-induced compaction on rhizosphere hydraulic properties—X-ray microtomography imaging and numerical simulations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 425–431 (2011) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Anselmucci, E. Andó, L. Sibille, N. Lenoir, R. Peyroux, C. Arson, G. Viggiani, A.G. Bengough, Root-reinforced sand: kinematic response of the soil. In 7th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, IS-Glasgow (EDP Sciences, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Lucas, S. Schlüter, H.J. Vogel, D. Vetterlein, Roots compact the surrounding soil depending on the structures they encounter. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1-13 (2019) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Nadimi, J. Fonseca, Enhancing soil sample preparation by thermal cycling. Géotechnique 66(11), 953-958 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. L.A. Feldkamp, G. Jesion, Chapter 2: Inversion, Imaging and Reconstruction, In Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. SpringerVerlag US 555-566 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Arganda-Carreras, V. Kaynig, C. Rueden, K.W. Eliceiri, J. Schindelin, A. Cardona, H. Sebastian Seung, Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics 33(15), 2424-2426 (2017) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.Y. Tinevez, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. methods 9(7), 676-682 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, I.H. Witten, The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter 11(1), 10-18 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  14. C.W.W. Ng, J.J. Ni, A.K. Leung, Z.J. Wang, A new and simple water retention model for root-permeated soils. Geotech. Lett. 6(1), 106-111 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. J.R. Helliwell, A.J. Miller, W.R. Whalley, S.J. Mooney, C.J. Sturrock, Quantifying the impact of microbes on soil structural development and behaviour in wet soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 74, 138-147 (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.