EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 251 (2021) EPJ Web Conf., 251 (2021) 03025 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2021
25th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2021)
Article Number 03025
Number of page(s) 9
Section Offline Computing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125103025
Published online 23 August 2021
  1. A. Sailer, G. Ganis, P. Mato, M. Petric, G.A. Stewart, EPJ Web Conf. 245, 10002 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Gaede, B. Hegner, G.A. Stewart, EPJ Web Conf. 245, 05024 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. Key4hep Github Repository, https://github.com/key4hep [Google Scholar]
  4. Key4hep Software Group et al., Key4Hep-doc: Documentation for key4hep-software (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4564650 [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Gaede, B. Hegner, P. Mato, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898, 072039 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Gamblin, M. LeGendre, M.R. Collette, G.L. Lee, A. Moody, B.R. de Supinski, S. Futral, The Spack package manager: bringing order to HPC software chaos, in SC15: International Conference for High-Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2015), https://doi.org/10.1145/2807591.2807623 [Google Scholar]
  7. https://github.com/key4hep/EDM4hep [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Gaede, T. Behnke, N. Graf, T. Johnson, LCIO —A persistency framework for linear collider simulation studies, in CHEP 2003 (La Jolla, California, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  9. https://github.com/HEP-FCC/fcc-edm [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Gaede, G. Ganis, B. Hegner, C. Helsens, T. Madlener, A. Sailer, G. Stewart, V. Volkl, J. Wang, EDM4hep and PODIO- The event data model of the Key4hep project and its implementation (2021), submitted to this conference [Google Scholar]
  11. Ilcsoft GitHub Repository, https://github.com/iLCSoft [Google Scholar]
  12. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3), JHEP 02, 057 (2014), 1307.6346 [Google Scholar]
  13. https://github.Com/delphes/delphes/tree/3.4.3pre09 [Google Scholar]
  14. https://www.pi.infn.it/~bedeschi/RD_FA/Software/ [Google Scholar]
  15. https://indico.cern.ch/event/783429/contributions/3376675/attachments/1829951/3712651/Oxford_April2019_V1.pdf [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Volkl et al., K4Simdelphes: Delphes Integration in the Key4hep Framework (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4564683 [Google Scholar]
  17. https://evtgen.hepforge.org/ [Google Scholar]
  18. LHCb Collaboration, ATLAS Collaboration, Gaudi v33r0 (2019), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3660964 [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Petric, M. Frank, F. Gaede, S. Lu, N. Nikiforou, A. Sailer, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898, 042015 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/898W042015 [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Gaede, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A559, 177 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Arominski, J.J. Blaising, E. Brondolin, D. Dannheim, K. Elsener, F. Gaede, I. Garcia-Garcia, S. Green, D. Hynds, E. Leogrande et al., A detector for CLIC: main parameters and performance (2018), 1812.07337, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2649437 [Google Scholar]
  22. V. Volkl et al., K4Fwcore: Core I/O Components for the Key4hep Framework (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4564605 [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Volkl et al., k4Gen: Generator components for the Key4hep framework (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4564609 [Google Scholar]
  24. V. Volkl et al., k4SimGeant4: Key4hep Framwework Integration for Geant4 (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4564574 [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Volkl et al., k4RecCalorimeter: Calorimeter Reconstruction in the Key4hep Framework (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4564669 [Google Scholar]
  26. V. Volkl et al., Fccdetectors: DD4hep Models for FCC Detectors (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4564612 [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Ko et al., Dual-readout: DD4hep Geometry for a Dual-Readout Calorimeter (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4564615 [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Amhis, C. Helsens, D. Hill, O. Sumensari (2021), 2105.13330 [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Dong et al. (CEPC Study Group) (2018), 1811.10545 [Google Scholar]
  30. J.S. Marshall, M.A. Thomson, Pandora Particle Flow Algorithm, in International Conference on Calorimetry for the High Energy Frontier (2013), pp. 305–315, 1308.4537 [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Cervantes Villanueva, G. Ganis, D. Konstantinov, G. Latyshev, P. Mato Vila, P. Mendez Lorenzo, R. Pacholek, I. Razumov, EPJ Web Conf. 214, 05020 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  32. J.C. Wang, Key4Hep Container (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4553189 [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Merkel, Linux J. 2014 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  34. Podman, http://docs.podman.io/ [Google Scholar]
  35. G.M. Kurtzer, V. Sochat, M.W. Bauer, PLOS ONE 12, 1 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  36. J.C. Wang, Cacher (2021), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4553191 [Google Scholar]
  37. Buildbot, https://buildbot.net/ [Google Scholar]
  38. Mageia.org Foundation, Mageia Linux (2019), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4553891 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.