Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2021
25th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2021)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 12
Section Online Computing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125104001
Published online 23 August 2021
  1. A. Piucci, The LHCb Upgrade, Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 878 (2017), https://iopscience.iop.Org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/878/1/012012/pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. J. M. Jimenez, et al., Summary of session 8: Long Shutdown 2 strategy and preparation, Proceedings of Chamonix 2014 Workshop on LHC Performance (2016), https: //e-publishing.cern.ch/index.php/CYR/article/view/111/55 [Google Scholar]
  3. LHCb collaboration, LHCb Trigger and Online Technical Design Report, CERN-LHCC- 2014-016, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1701361/files/LHCB-TDR-016.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Colombo, et al., The LHCb DAQ Upgrade for LHC Run3, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science vol. 66 (7), (2019), https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8727952 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Colombo, et al., The LHCb Online system in 2020: trigger-free read-out with (almost exclusively) off-the-shelf hardware, Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 1085 (3), (2018), https://inspirehep.net/literature/1699857 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Valat, et al., An Evaluation of100-Gb/s LAN Networks for the LHCb DAQ grade, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science vol. 64 (6), (2017), https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 7886309 [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Pisani, et al., Network simulation of a 40 MHz event building system for the LHCb experiment, EPJ Web of Conferences vol. 245 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Colombo, et al., Flit-level InfiniBand network simulations of the DAQ system of the LHCb experiment for Run-3, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 66 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. R. D. Krawczyk, et al. Feasibility tests of RoCE v2 for LHCb event building, EPJ Web of Conferences vol. 245 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Krawczyk et al.: 32 Tb/s DAQ for the LHCb experiment at CERN, DAQFEET-21 Worksop slides, https://indico.cern.ch/event/974424/contributions/4217589/attachments/ 2186332/3694141/DAQFEET_9_02_21_FINAL.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Bozzi, et al., Towards a computing model for the LHCb Upgrade EPJ Web of Conferences vol. 214 (2019), https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2019/19/epjconf_chep2018_03045.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Aaij, et al., Design and performance of the LHCb trigger and full real-time reconstruction in Run 2 of the LHC, Journal of instrumentation vol. 4 (2019), https://arxiv.org/ abs/1812.10790 [Google Scholar]
  13. R. D. Krawczyk, dedicated_eb_stresstest benchmark, CERN GitLab Repository, https: //gitlab.cern.ch/lhcb-online-eb/dedicated-eb-stresstest [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Frank, et al. Online project, CERN GitLab Repository, https://gitlab.cern.ch/lhcb/ Online [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Granado Cardoso, et al., Integration of custom DAQ Electronics in a SCADA Framework, PJ Web of Conferences vol. 245 (2020), https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2020/21/epjconf_chep2020_01016/epjconf_chep2020_01016.html [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.