Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2021
25th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2021)
Article Number 04029
Number of page(s) 10
Section Online Computing
Published online 23 August 2021
  1. I. Kisel, “Event reconstruction in the CBM experiment”, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 566 (2006) 85. [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Kisel, I. Kulakov, and M. Zyzak, “Standalone First Level Event Selection Package for the CBM Experiment”, IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Science, 60, 5, (2013) 3703. [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Lavrik (on behalf of CBM Collaboration), “Compressed Baryonic Matter Experiment at FAIR”, AIP Conference Proceedings 2163, 030009 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Kisel (for CBM and STAR Collaborations), “Real-Time Event Reconstruction and Analysis in CBM and STAR Experiments”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1602 (2020) 012006. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Zyzak, “Online Selection of Short-Lived Particles on Many-Core Computer Architectures in the CBM Experiment at FAIR”, Dissertation thesis, Goethe university, Frankfurt am Main (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. Development of machine- and deep-learning tools for data analysis and detector design, [Google Scholar]
  7. Artificial neural networks for optimisation in online marketing, [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Sergeev, E. Bratkovskaya, I. Kisel and I. Vassiliev, “Deep learning for quark gluon plasma detection in the CBM experiment”, International Journal of Modern Physics A, Vol. 35, No. 33 (2020) 204–3002. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Banerjee, I. Kisel and M. Zyzak, “Artificial neural network for identification of short-lived particles in the CBM experiment”, International Journal of Modern Physics A, Vol. 35, No. 33 (2020) 204–3003. [Google Scholar]
  10. V. Akishina, I. Kisel, P. Kisel, P. Senger, I. Vassiliev, and M. Zyzak, “Reconstruction of Particles Produced at Different Stages of Heavy Ion Collision in the CBM Experiment at FAIR”, Poster, Quark Matter 2017, 5-11 February 2017, Chicago, USA. [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Fisyak, I. Kisel, P. Kisel, P. Senger, I. Vassiliev, and M. Zyzak, “Applying the Missing Mass Method to the STAR at RHIC data”, CBM Progress Report 2017, GSI, Darmstadt, DOI: 10.15120/GSI-2018-00485, (2018) p. 197. [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Fisyak, V. Ivanov, H. Ke, I. Kisel, P. Kisel, G. Kozlov, A. Tang, and I. Vassiliev, “Application of the Missing Mass Method in STAR BES-II fixed-target program”, CBM Progress Report 2020, GSI, Darmstadt, DOI: 10.15120/GSI-2021-00421, (2021) p. 223. [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Yang (for the STAR Collaboration), “The STAR beam energy scan phase II physics and upgrades”, Nuclear Physics A 967 (2017) 800. [Google Scholar]
  14. STAR Collaboration, “Studying the Phase Diagram of QCD Matter at RHIC”, STAR Note 598, Mar. 28, 2014, [Google Scholar]
  15. STAR Collaboration, “Technical Design Report for the iTPC Upgrade”, STAR Note 644, Nov. 30, 2015, [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Deppner and N. Herrmann, “The FAIR Phase 0 program of the CBM TOF”, Journal of Instrumentation 15 (2020) C10030. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.