Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
ANIMMA 2021 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 05001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Nuclear Power Reactor Monitoring and Control
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125305001
Published online 19 November 2021
  1. F. Dechelette, F. Morin, G. Laffont, G. Rodriguez, E. Sanseigne, S. Christin, X. Mognot, and A. Morcillo, “Study and Evaluation of Innovative Fuel Handling Systems for Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors: Fuel Handling Route Optimization, ” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Spanner, “Preliminary development of in-service inspection methods for LMFBRs, ” in Specialists Meeting on “Inservice Inspection and Monitoring of LMFBR’s”, Bensberg, Germany, Mar. 1976. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. C. Scott, P. R. Huebotter, and R.C. Callen, “Potential applications for an under-sodium ultrasonic scanning device, ” Tech. Rep. Atomic Power Development Associates Report APDA-205, Jul. 1967. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. N. Ord and R.W. Smith, “Development of UnderSodium Ultrasonic Scanner for inReactor Surveillance, ” Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, Washington, Tech. Rep. Technical Report: HEDL-TME 72-91, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  5. C. K. Day and R.W. Smith, “Under-Sodium Viewing, ” in IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Monterey, California, USA, Nov. 1973, pp. 191–194. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. V. Dyck and M. Dierckx, “An Ultrasonic Fuel Identification System for Liquid Metal Cooled Reactors Resilient Against Multiple Transducer Failures, ” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 2291–2299, Aug. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Lhuillier, B. Marchand, J. M. Augem, J. Sibilo, and J.F. Saillant, “Generation IV nuclear reactors: Under sodium ultrasonic transducers for Inspection and Surveillance, ” in 2013 3rd International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation, Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA), Jun. 2013, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Lhuillier, “Method for Manufacturing a High-Temperature Ultrasonic Transducer Using a Lithium Niobate Crystal Brazed with Gold and Indium, ” France Patent US20 140 215 784 A1, Aug., 2014. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Paumel and C. Lhuillier, “Identifying subassemblies by ultrasound to prevent fuel handling error in sodium fast reactors: First test performed in water, ” in 2015 4th International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA), Apr. 2015, pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Paumel, “Subassembly identification by ultrasound in sodium cooled fast reactors, ” in 2018 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), May 2018, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  11. N. N. Abboud, G. L. Wojcik, D. K. Vaughan, J. Mould, D. J. Powell, and L. Nikodym, “Finite element modeling for ultrasonic transducers, ” in Ultrasonic Transducer Engineering: Medical Imaging 1998, K. K. Shung, Ed. Bellingham: Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering, 1998, vol. 3341, pp. 19–42, wOS:000074538600002. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Redwood, “Transient Performance of a Piezoelectric Transducer, ” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 527–536, Apr. 1961. [Online]. Available: https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.1908709 [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Krimholtz, D. A. Leedom, and G.L. Matthaei, “New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers, ” Electronics Letters, vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 398–399, Jun. 1970. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Maréchal, F. Levassort, L.-P. Tran-Huu-Hue, and M. Lethiecq, “Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model, ” Ultrasonics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 155–167, May 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041624X07000194 [Google Scholar]
  15. ——, “Effect of Radial Displacement of Lens on Response of Focused Ultrasonic Transducer, ” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 46, no. 5R, p. 3077, May 2007. [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Filoux, S. Calle, R. Lou-Moeller, M. Lethiecq, and F. Levassort, “3-D numerical modeling for axisymmetrical piezoelectric structures: application to high-frequency ultrasonic transducers, ” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1188–1199, May 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. H. T. O’Neil, “Theory of Focusing Radiators, ” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 516–526, Sep. 1949. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. N. Bilgunde and L.J. Bond, “A 2d finite element simulation of liquid coupled ultrasonic NDT system, ” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1650, no. 1, pp. 1543–1552, Mar. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.4914773 [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Mahaut, S. Chatillon, M. Darmon, N. Leymarie, R. Raillon, and P. Calmon, “An Overview of Ultrasonic Beam Propagation and Flaw Scattering Models in the Civa Software, ” in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vols 29a and 29b, D. O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Eds., vol. 1211. Melville: Amer Inst Physics, 2010, pp. 2133–2140. [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Gengembre and A. Lhémery, “Pencil method in elastodynamics: application to ultrasonic field computation, ” Ultrasonics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 495–499, Mar. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Giot, L. Vermeeren, A. Lyoussi, C. Reynard-Carette, C. Lhuillier, P. Mégret, F. Deconinck, and B. S. Gonçalves, “Nuclear instrumentation and measurement: a review based on the ANIMMA conferences, ” EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, vol. 3, p. 33, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. B. G. Lucas and T.G. Muir, “The field of a focusing source, ” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 1289–1296, Oct. 1982. [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Goldstein, “Steady state spherically focused, circular aperture beam patterns, ” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1441–1458, Oct. 2006. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.