EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 253 (2021) EPJ Web Conf., 253 (2021) 08001 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
ANIMMA 2021 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 08001
Number of page(s) 5
Section Decommissioning, Dismantling and Remote Handling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125308001
Published online 19 November 2021
  1. D. Connor, P.G. Martin, T.B. Scott, “Airborne radiation mapping: Overview and application of current and future aerial systems” International Journal of Remote Sensing 2016;37(24):5953–87, 10.1080/01431161.2016.1252474. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Kurvinen, P. Smolander, R. Pöllänen, S. Kuukankorpi, M. Kettunen, J. Lyytinen, “Design of a radiation surveillance unit for an unmanned aerial vehicle” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 2005;81(1):1–10, 10.1016/j.jenvrad.4332004.10.009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Martin, O. Payton, J. Fardoulis, D. Richards, T. Scott, “The use of unmanned aerial systems for the mapping of legacy uranium mines” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 2015;143:135–40, 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.43702.004. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Martin, O. Payton, J. Fardoulis, D. Richards, Y. Yamashiki, T. Scott, “Low altitude unmanned aerial vehicle for characterising remediation effectiveness following the FDNPP accident” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 441 2016;151:58–63, 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.09.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Selivanova, J. Hulka, T. Vrba, I. Cešpírová, “Efficiency calibration of a CZT detector and MDA determination for post accidental unmanned aerial vehicle dosimetry” Applied Radiation and Isotopes 2019;154:108879, doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108879. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Sanada, T. Torii, “Aerial radiation monitoring around the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant using an unmanned helicopter”, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 2015;139:294–9, 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.06.027. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Kurvinen, P. Smolander, R. Pöllänen, S. Kuukankorpi, M. Kettunen, J. Lyytinen, “Design of a radiation surveillance unit for an unmanned aerial vehicle”, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 2005;81(1):1–10, 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.10.009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Pöllänen, H. Toivonen, K. Peräjärvi, T. Karhunen, T. Ilander, J. Lehtinen, K. Rintala, T. Katajainen, J. Niemelä, M. Juusela, “Radiation surveillance using an unmanned aerial vehicle”, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 2009;67(2):340–4, 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.10.008. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Cester, G. Nebbia, L. Stevanato, G. Viesti, F. Neri, S. Petrucci, et al., “Special nuclear material detection with a mobile multi-detector system”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2012;663(1):55–63, 10.1016/j.nima.2011.10.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Hartwell, R. Gehrke, “Observations on the background spectra of four LaCl3(Ce) scintillation detectors”, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 2005;63(2):223–8, 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.02.009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Kernan, “Self-activity in lanthanum halides”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 2006;53(1):395–400, 10.1109/TNS.2006.869849. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R.S. Woolf, B.F. Phlips, W.A. Wulf, “Characterization of the internal background for thermal and fast neutron detection with CLLB”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2016;838:147–53, 10.1016/j.nima.2016.09.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Hull, F. Camera, G. Colombi, M. Josselin, B. Million, N. Blasi, “Detection properties and internal activity of newly developed Lacontaining scintillator crystals”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2019;925:70–5, doi:10.1016/j.nima.2019.01.094. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R.S. Woolf, E.A. Wulf, B.F. Phlips, P. Chowdhury, E.G. Jackson, “Identification of internal radioactive contaminants in elpasolites (CLYC, CLLB, CLLBC) and other inorganic scintillators”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2020;954:161228, 10.1016/j.nima.2018.09.063. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. L. Fontana, M. Lunardon, F. E. Pino, L. Stevanato, A. Carnera, C. Sada, F. Soramel, S. Moretto, (2018). “A distributed data acquisition system for nuclear detectors”. International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, 48, 1860118., 10.1142/S2010194518601187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C.L. Fontana, M. Lunardon, F.E. Pino, L. Stevanato, S. Moretto, (2019) “Resource sharing in nuclear physics laboratory classes: A distributed data acquisition system for experiments with shared resources and data management.” In 25th international conference on the application of accelerators in research and industry (p. 050024). Texas, doi:10.1063/1.5127716. [Google Scholar]
  17. C. L. Fontana, M. Lunardon, F. E. Pino, L. Stevanato, A. Carnera, C. Sada, F. Soramel, S. Moretto, (2017b). “A distributed data acquisition system for signal digitizers with on-line analysis capabilities”. In 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imagi [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Cester, G. Nebbia, L. Stevanato, F.E. Pino, G. Viesti, (2014). “Experimental tests of the new plastic scintillator with pulse shape discrimination capabilities EJ-299-33”. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 735, 202–206. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2013.09.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.