Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2022
A Virtual Tribute to Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum (vConf21)
Article Number 08004
Number of page(s) 8
Section Parallel Presentations Track G
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202225808004
Published online 11 January 2022
  1. T. Appelquist et al. [LSD Collaboration], Lattice simulations with eight flavors of domain wall fermions in SU(3) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 90 114502 (2014) [arXiv:1405.4752 [hep-lat]]; Strongly interacting dynamics and the search for new physics at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 93 114514 (2016) [arXiv:1601.04027 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Appelquist et al. [Lattice Strong Dynamics], Nonperturbative investigations of SU(3) gauge theory with eight dynamical flavors, Phys. Rev. D 99 014509 (2019) [arXiv:1807.08411 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Aoki et al. [LatKMI Collaboration], Light flavor-singlet scalars and walking signals in Nf = 8 QCD on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 96 014508 (2017) [arXiv:1610.07011 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, C. Schroeder and C. H. Wong, Can the nearly conformal sextet gauge model hide the Higgs impostor?, Phys. Lett. B 718, 657 (2012) [arXiv:1209.0391 [hep-lat]]; Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi and C. H. Wong, Can a light Higgs impostor hide in composite gauge models?, PoS LATTICE 2013, 062 (2014) [arXiv:1401.2176 [hep-lat]]; The twelve-flavor ß-function and dilaton tests of the sextet scalar, EPJ Web Conf. 175, 08015 (2018) [arXiv:1712.08594 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti and C. H. Wong, Tantalizing dilaton tests from a near-conformal EFT, PoS LATTICE 2018, 196 (2019) [arXiv:1901.06324 [hep-lat]]; Dilaton EFT from p-regime to RMT in the e-regime, PoS LATTICE2019, 246 (2020) arXiv:2002.05163 [hep-lat]. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Appelquist et al. [Lattice Strong Dynamics], Near-conformal dynamics in a chirally broken system, Phys. Rev. D 103 014504 (2021) [arXiv:2007.01810 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  7. R. C. Brower, A. Hasenfratz, C. Rebbi, E. Weinberg and O. Witzel, Composite Higgs model at a conformal fixed point, Phys. Rev. D 93 075028 (2016) [arXiv:1512.02576 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Low-energy effective action for pions and a dilatonic meson, Phys. Rev. D 94 054502 (2016) [arXiv:1603.04575 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Effective field theory for pions and a dilatonic meson, PoS LATTICE 2016, 205 (2016) [arXiv:1610.01752 [hep-ph]] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Large-mass regime of the dilaton-pion low-energy effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 98 056025 (2018) [arXiv:1805.00198 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Golterman, E. T. Neil and Y. Shamir, Application of dilaton chiral perturbation theory to Nf = 8, SU(3) spectral data, Phys. Rev. D 102 034515 (2020) [arXiv:2003.00114 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Explorations beyond dilaton chiral perturbation theory in the eight-flavor SU(3) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114507 (2020) [arXiv:2009.13846 [hep-lat]]. [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai, Dilaton EFT Framework For Lattice Data, JHEP 1707, 035 (2017) [arXiv:1702.04410 [hep-ph]]; Analysis of a Dilaton EFT for Lattice Data, JHEP 1803, 039 (2018) [arXiv:1711.00067 [hep-ph]]; [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai, Dilaton potential and lattice data, Phys. Rev. D 101 075025 (2020) [arXiv:1908.00895 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.