EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 258 (2022) EPJ Web Conf., 258 (2022) 10008 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2022
A Virtual Tribute to Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum (vConf21)
Article Number 10008
Number of page(s) 5
Section Parallel Presentations Track Focus Subs
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202225810008
Published online 11 January 2022
  1. Global polarization measurement in Au+Au collisions, STAR Collaboration (B.I. Abelev et al.), Phys.Rev. C76 (2007) 024915, Erratum: Phys.Rev. C95 (2017) no.3, 039906 STAR-05-11-2007, e-Print: arXiv:0705.1691 [nucl-ex]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chiral vortaic effect and neutron asymmetries in heavy-ion collisions O. Rogachevsky, A. Sorin, O. Teryaev, Phys.Rev. C82 (2010) 054910, e-Print: arXiv:1006.1331 [hep-ph]; [Google Scholar]
  3. Helicity separation in Heavy-Ion Collisions, M. Baznat, K. Gudima, A. Sorin, O. Teryaev, Phys.Rev. C88 (2013) no. 6, 061901, e-Print: arXiv:1301.7003 [nucl-th]; [Google Scholar]
  4. A polarization in peripheral heavy ion collisions, F. Becattini, L. Csernai, D.J. Wang, Phys.Rev. C88 (2013) no. 3, 034905, Erratum: Phys.Rev. C93 (2016) no.6, 069901, arXiv:1304.4427 [nucl-th]; Angular momentum conservation in heavy ion collisions at very high energy, F. Becattini, F. Piccinini, J. Rizzo, Phys.Rev. C77 (2008) 024906, arXiv:0711.1253 [nucl-th]; F. Becattini, V. Chandra, L. Del Zanna, and E. Grossi, arXiv:1303.3431 [nucl-th]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Global hyperon polarization at local thermodynamic equilibrium with vorticity, magnetic field and feed-down, F. Becattini, I. Karpenko, M. Lisa, I. Upsal, S. Voloshin, e-Print: arXiv:1610.02506 [nucl-th]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Axial anomaly and energy dependence ofhyperon polarization in Heavy-Ion Collisions, A. Sorin, O. Teryaev, Phys.Rev. C95 (2017) no. 1, 011902, e-Print: arXiv:1606.08398 [nucl-th]. [Google Scholar]
  7. A.V. Sadofyev, V.I. Shevchenko, and V.I. Zakharov, Notes on chiral hydrodynamics within effective theory approach, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 105025, arXiv:1012.1958 [hep-th]. [Google Scholar]
  8. O. V. Teryaev and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 9, 096023 (2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.096023 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. V. Efremov and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Lett. B 150, 383 (1985) DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(85)90999-2 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. W. Qiu and G. F. Sterman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2264–2267 (1991) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2264 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. J. Brodsky, D. S. Hwang and I. Schmidt, Phys. Lett. B 530, 99–107 (2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01320-5 [arXiv:hep-ph/0201296 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. C. Collins, Phys. Lett. B 536, 43–48 (2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01819-1 [arXiv:hep-ph/0204004 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. I. Baznat, K. K. Gudima, A. S. Sorin and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. C 93, no. 3, 031902 (2016) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.031902 [arXiv:1507.04652 [nucl-th]]. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Feynman, Statistical Mechanics: A Set Of Lectures (W.A. Benjamin, Reading, Mass., 1972) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. A. Lisa, J. G. P. Barbon, D. D. Chinellato, W. M. Serenone, C. Shen, J. Takahashi and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. C 104, no. 1, 011901 (2021) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L011901 [arXiv:2101.10872 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  16. W. M. Serenone, J. G. P. Barbon, D. D. Chinellato, M. A. Lisa, C. Shen, J. Takahashi and G. Torrieri, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136500 (2021) DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136500 [arXiv:2102.11919 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  17. F. J. Kornas [HADES], Springer Proc. Phys. 250, 435–439 (2020) DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-53448-6_68 [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. B. Ivanov and A. A. Soldatov, Phys. Rev. C 97, no. 4, 044915 (2018) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044915 [arXiv:1803.01525 [nucl-th]]. [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Zinchenko, A. Sorin, O. Teryaev and M. Baznat, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1435, no. 1, 012030 (2020) DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1435/1/012030 [Google Scholar]
  20. A. V. Efremov, L. Mankiewicz and N. A. Tornqvist, Phys. Lett. B 284, 394–400 (1992) DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(92)90451-9 [Google Scholar]
  21. O. Teryaev and R. Usubov, Phys. Rev. C 92, no. 1, 014906 (2015) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.014906 [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Nazarova, R. Akhat, M. Baznat, O. Teryaev and A. Zinchenko, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 18, no. 4, 429–438 (2021) DOI: 10.1134/S1547477121040142 [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Ayala, M. A. Ayala Torres, E. Cuautle, I. Domínguez, M. A. Fontaine Sanchez, I. Maldonado, E. Moreno-Barbosa, P. A. Nieto-Marín, M. Rodríguez-Cahuantzi and J. Salinas, et al. Phys. Lett. B 810, 135818 (2020) DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135818 [arXiv:2003.13757 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Arbuzov, A. Bacchetta, M. Butenschoen, F. G. Celiberto, U. D’Alesio, M. Deka, I. Denisenko, M. G. Echevarria, A. Efremov and N. Y. Ivanov, et al. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 119, 103858 (2021) DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103858 [arXiv:2011.15005 [hep-ex]]. [Google Scholar]
  25. F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli and A. Palermo, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136519 (2021) DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136519 [arXiv:2103.10917 [nucl-th]]. [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Policastro, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 081601 (2001) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.081601 [arXiv:hep-th/0104066 [hep-th]]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.