Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 276, 2023
The 20th International Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter (SQM 2022)
Article Number 01019
Number of page(s) 6
Section Bulk Matter Phenomena, QCD Phase Diagram, and Critical Point
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202327601019
Published online 01 March 2023
  1. Y. Aoki et al. Nature 443 (2006), pp. 675–678. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Bazavov et al., HotQCD. Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019), pp. 15–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. A. Halasz et al. Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998), p. 096007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chi Yang. Nucl. Phys. A 967 (2017), pp. 800–803. [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Adamczyk et al., STAR. Phys. Rev. C 96.4 (2017), p. 044904. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Adam et al., STAR. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126.9 (2021), p. 092301. [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Hatta and M. A. Stephanov. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 91, 129901 (2003)], p. 102003. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Kitazawa and M. Asakawa. Phys. Rev. C 86 (2012). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 86, 069902 (2012)], p. 024904. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. A. Stephanov. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009), p. 032301. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Bazavov et al. Phys. Rev. D 101.7 (2020), p. 074502. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. S. Abdallah et al., STAR. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127.26 (2021), p. 262301. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. S. Abdallah et al., STAR. Phys. Rev. C 104.2 (2021), p. 024902. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Garg et al. Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013), pp. 691–696. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Braun-Munzinger et al. Nucl. Phys. A 1008 (2021), p. 122141. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Bleicher et al. J. Phys. G 25 (1999), pp. 1859–1896. [Google Scholar]
  16. STAR. arXiv: 2207.09837v1 [nucl-ex]. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. S. Abdallah et al., STAR. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128.20 (2022), p. 202303. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wei-Jie Fu et al. Phys. Rev. D 104.9 (2021), p. 094047. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. A. Stephanov. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011), p. 052301. [Google Scholar]
  20. B. J. Schaefer and M. Wagner. Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012), p. 034027. [Google Scholar]
  21. J.-W. Chen et al. Phys. Rev. D 93.3 (2016), p. 034037. [Google Scholar]
  22. J.-W. Chen et al. Phys. Rev. D 95.1 (2017), p. 014038. [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Adamczewski-Musch et al., HADES. Phys. Rev. C 102.2 (2020), p. 024914. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. S. Abdallah et al. Phys. Lett. B 827 (2022), p. 137003. [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Adamczewski-Musch et al. Phys. Lett. B 778 (2018), pp. 403–107. [Google Scholar]
  26. M. S. Abdallah et al. Phys. Lett. B 831 (2022), p. 137152. [Google Scholar]
  27. H.-T. Ding et al. Eur. Phys. J. A 57.6 (2021), p. 202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhenzhen Yang, Xiaofeng Luo, and Bedangadas Mohanty. Phys. Rev. C 95.1 (2017), p. 014914. [Google Scholar]
  29. Toshihiro Nonaka. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1039 (2022), p. 167171. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.