Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 276, 2023
The 20th International Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter (SQM 2022)
Article Number 01021
Number of page(s) 7
Section Bulk Matter Phenomena, QCD Phase Diagram, and Critical Point
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202327601021
Published online 01 March 2023
  1. A. Bauswein, S. Goriely and H. T. Janka, Astrophys. J. 773, 78 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Hanauske, J. Steinheimer, L. Bovard, A. Mukherjee, S. Schramm, K. Takami, J. Papenfort, N. Wechselberger, L. Rezzolla and H. Stöcker, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 878, no. 1 012031 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  3. E. R. Most, A. Motornenko, J. Steinheimer, V. Dexheimer, M. Hanauske, L. Rezzolla and H. Stoecker, [arXiv:2201.13150 [nucl-th]]. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Lett. B 730, 99–104 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Bazavov et al. [HotQCD], Phys. Rev. D 90, 094503 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. A. Bass, M. Belkacem, M. Bleicher, M. Brandstetter, L. Bravina, C. Ernst, L. Gerland, M. Hofmann, S. Hofmann and J. Konopka, et al. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 255–369 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Bleicher, E. Zabrodin, C. Spieles, S. A. Bass, C. Ernst, S. Soff, L. Bravina, M. Belkacem, H. Weber and H. Stoecker, et al. J. Phys. G 25, 1859–1896 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Aichelin, Phys. Rept. 202, 233–360 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Motornenko, S. Pal, A. Bhattacharyya, J. Steinheimer and H. Stoecker, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054908 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Steinheimer, S. Schramm and H. Stöcker, Phys. Rev. C 84, 045208 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Sorensen and V. Koch, Phys. Rev. C 104, no. 3, 034904 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Steinheimer, A. Motornenko, A. Sorensen, Y. Nara, V. Koch and M. Bleicher, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) no. 10, 911. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Omana Kuttan, A. Motornenko, J. Steinheimer, H. Stoecker, Y. Nara and M. Bleicher, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no. 5 427 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Alt et al. [NA49], Phys. Rev. C 73, 044910 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Adamczyk et al. [STAR], Phys. Rev. C 96, no. 4 044904 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Adam et al. [STAR], Phys. Rev. C 102, no. 3 034909 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Pinkenburg et al. [E895], Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1295–1298 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Adamova et al. [CERES], Nucl. Phys. A 698, 253–260 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Andronic et al. [FOPI], Phys. Lett. B 612, 173–180 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Adamczyk et al. [STAR], Phys. Rev. C 86, 054908 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Adam et al. [STAR], Phys. Rev. C 103, no. 3 034908 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Adamczewski-Musch et al. [HADES], Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 262301 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  23. M. S. Abdallah et al. [STAR], Phys. Lett. B 827, 137003 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  24. M. S. Abdallah et al. [STAR], Phys. Lett. B 827, 136941 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Adamczewski-Musch et al. [HADES], [arXiv:2208.02740 [nucl-ex]]. [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Kashirin et al. [NA61/Shine], J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1690, no. 1 012127 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Barrette et al. [E877], Phys. Rev. C 55, 1420–1430 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  28. C. Alt et al. [NA49], Phys. Rev. C 68, 034903 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Stoecker, Nucl. Phys. A 750, 121–147 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  30. D. Oliinychenko, A. Sorensen, V. Koch and L. McLerran, [arXiv:2208.11996 [nucl-th]]. [Google Scholar]
  31. Y. Nara, A. Jinno, K. Murase and A. Ohnishi, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022) no. 4, 4. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.