EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 281 (2023) EPJ Web Conf., 281 (2023) 00023 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 281, 2023
5th International Workshop on Nuclear Data Covariances (CW2022)
Article Number 00023
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328100023
Published online 29 March 2023
  1. L. Fiorito, D. Piedra, O. Cabellos and C. Diez, “Inventory calculation and nuclear data uncertainty propagation on lightwater reactor fuel using ALEPH-2 and SCALE 6.2, ” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 83, pp. 137-146, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Cabellos, D. Piedra, C. Diez and L. Fiorito., “Impact of the fission yield nuclear data uncertainties in the pin-cell burn-up OECD/NEA UAM benchmark, ” in presentation at the International Conference on the Role of Reactor Physics toward a Sustainable Future — PHYSOR, Kyoto (Japan), 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Schunck and L. M. Robledo, “Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review, ” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 79, p. 116301, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. C. Wahl, “Nuclear-charge distribution and delayed-neutron yields for thermal-neutroninduced fission of 235U, 233U, and 239Pu and for spontaneous fission of 252Cf, ” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 39, pp. 1-156, 1988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Madland and T. England, “The Influence of Isomeric States on Independent Fission Product Yields, ” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 64, p. 859–865, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Kellet et al., “The JEFF-3.1/-3.1.1 radioactive decay data and fission yields sub-libraries, ” OECD NEA, JEFF Report 20 OECD NEA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  7. D. A. Brown et al., “ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Librarywith CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data, ” Nuclear Data Sheets, vol. 148, pp. 1-142, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Katakura, “JENDL FP Decay data file 2011 and fission, ” in JAEA-Data/Code 2011-025, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Serot, “Physique des réacteurs Modélisation et évaluation des observables de fission, ” Techniques de l’ingénieur, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Zeynalov, W. Furman and F. Hambsch, “Investigation of Mass-TKE Distributions of Fission Fragments from the 235U(n, f)-Reaction in Resonances, ” in Proceedings of the 13th International Seminar on Interaction of Neutrons with Nuclei (ISINN-13) Neutron Spectroscopy, Nuclear Structure, Related Topics, Dubna (Russia), 2006. [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Litaize, O. Serot and L. Berge, “Fission modelling with FIFRELIN, ” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 51, p. 177, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. J. Koning, “Bayesian Monte Carlo Method for Nuclear Data Evaluation, ” Nuclear Data Scheets, vol. 123, pp. 207-213, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Metropolis, A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller and E. Teller, “Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines, ” Journal Chemical Physics, vol. 21, p. 1087–1092, 1953. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Newton and E. Raftery, “Approximate Bayesian Inference with the Weighted Likelihood Bootstrap, ” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 56, pp. 3-48, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt and M. P. Vecchi, “Optimization by Simulated Annealing, ” American Association for the Advancement of Science, vol. 220, no. 4598, pp. 671-680, 1983. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Kessedjian et al., “to be published, ” in CW 2022 conference, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  17. S-M. Cheikh et al., “to be published, ” in ND 2022 conference, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Lang, H.-G. Clerc and H. Wohlfarth, “Nuclear charge and mass yields for 235U(nth, f) as a function of the kinectic energy of the fission products, ” Nuclear Physics, vol. 345, pp. 34-71, 1980. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.