Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 288, 2023
ANIMMA 2023 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Fundamental Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328801005
Published online 21 November 2023
  1. S. Moncayo, L. Duponchel, N. Mousavipak, et al., “Exploration of megapixel hyperspectral LIBS images using principal component analysis, ” J. Anal. At. Spectrom., vol. 33, 210–220, 2 2018. doi: 10.1039/c7ja00398f. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Finotello, M. Tamaazousti, and J.-B. Sirven, “HyperPCA: A powerful tool to extract elemental maps from noisy data obtained in LIBS mapping of materials, ” Spectrochim. Acta Part B, vol. 192, 106418, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2022.106418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Sattmann, I. Monch, H. Krause, et al., “Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for polymer identification, ” Appl. Spectrosc., no. 3, 456–461, 1998. doi: 10.1366/0003702981943680. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L.-N. Li, X.-F. Liu, F. Yang, et al., “A review of artificial neural network based chemometrics applied in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analysis, ” Spectrochim. Acta Part B, vol. 180, 106183, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2021.106183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. V. C. Costa, D. V. Babos, J. P. Castro, et al., “Calibration strategies applied to laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: A critical review of advances and challenges, ” J. Braz. Chem. Soc., vol. 31, no. 12, 2439–2451, 2020. doi: 10.21577/0103-5053.20200175. [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Motto-Ros, S. Moncayo, F. Trichard, et al., “Investigation of signal extraction in the frame of laser induced breakdown spectroscopy imaging, ” Spectrochim. Acta Part B, vol. 155, 127–133, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2019.04.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. N. C. Dingari, I. Barman, A. K. Myakalwar, et al., “Incorporation of support vector machines in the LIBS toolbox for sensitive and robust classification amidst unexpected sample and system variability, ” Anal. Chem., vol. 84, no. 6, 2686–2694, 2012. doi: 10.1021/ac202755e. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Yaroshchyk, D. L. Death, and S. J. Spencer, “Comparison of principal components regression, partial least squares regression, multi-block partial least squares regression, and serial partial least squares regression algorithms for the analysis of Fe in iron ore using LIBS, ” J. Anal. At. Spectrom., vol. 27, no. 1, 92–98, 2012. doi: 10.1039/c1ja10164a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Takahashi and B. Thornton, “Quantitative methods for compensation of matrix effects and self-absorption in laser induced breakdown spectroscopy signals of solids, ” Spectrochim. Acta Part B, vol. 138, 31–42, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2017.09.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. D’Andrea, S. Pagnotta, E. Grifoni, et al., “A hybrid calibrationfree/artificial neural networks approach to the quantitative analysis of LIBS spectra, ” Appl. Phys. B, vol. 118, no. 3, 353–360, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s00340-014-5990-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Narlagiri and V. R. Soma, “Simultaneous quantification of Au and Ag composition from Au-Ag bi-metallic LIBS spectra combined with shallow neural network model for multi-output regression, ” Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt., vol. 127, no. 9, 135, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s00340-02107681-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Chen, L. Sun, H. Yu, et al., “Deep learning with laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for the classification of rocks based on elemental imaging, ” Appl. Geochem., vol. 136, 105135, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2021.105135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Caruana, “Multitask learning: A knowledge-based source of inductive bias, ” in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ser. Icml’93, Amherst, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1993, 41–48, isbn: 1558603077. doi: 10.1016/b978-1-55860-307-3.50012-5. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. B. Anderson, J. F. BellIII, R. C. Wiens, et al., “Clustering and training set selection methods for improving the accuracy of quantitative laser induced breakdown spectroscopy, ” Spectrochim. Acta Part B, vol. 70, 24–32, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2012.04.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. F. O. Borges, G. H. Cavalcanti, G. C. Gomes, et al., “A fast method for the calculation of electron number density and temperature in laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy plasmas using artificial neural networks, ” Appl. Phys. B, vol. 117, no. 1, 437–444, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s00340-014-5852-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Chen, H. Pei, J. Pisonero, et al., “Simultaneous determination of lithology and major elements in rocks using laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) coupled with a deep convolutional neural network, ” J. Anal. At. Spectrom., vol. 37, no. 3, 508–516, 2022. doi: 10.1039/d1ja00406a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J.-M. Mermet, “Limit of quantitation in atomic spectrometry: An unambiguous concept?” Spectrochim. Acta Part B, vol. 63, no. 2, 166–182, 2008, Honoring Issue A Collection of Papers on Atomic, Molecular and Laser Spectroscopy Dedicated to James D. Winefordner. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2007.11.029. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Zhao, C. Li, C. Yan, et al., “Interpretable deep learning assisted laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy for brand classification of iron ores, ” Anal. Chim. Acta, vol. 1166, 338574, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338574. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. X. Zhang, J. Xu, J. Yang, et al., “Understanding the learning mechanism of convolutional neural networks in spectral analysis, ” Anal. Chim. Acta, vol. 1119, 41–51, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.03.055. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Völker, G. Wilsch, I. B. Gornushkin, et al., “Interlaboratory comparison for quantitative chlorine analysis in cement pastes with laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy, ” Spectrochim. Acta Part B, vol. 202, 106632, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2023.106632. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Sansonetti, Handbook of Basic Atomic Spectroscopic Data, NIST Standard Reference Database 108, 2003. doi: 10.18434/T4FW23. [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Bergstra, R. Bardenet, Y. Bengio, et al., “Algorithms for hyperparameter optimization, ” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, P. Bartlett, et al., Eds., vol. 24, Curran Associates, Inc., 2011, doi:10.5555/2986459.2986743. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.