Open Access
Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 288, 2023
ANIMMA 2023 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 06003 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Nuclear Safeguards, Homeland Security and CBRN | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328806003 | |
Published online | 21 November 2023 |
- P. E. Kinahan, M. Defrise and R. Clackdoyle, “Analytic image reconstruction methods”, in Emission Tomography: The Fundamentals of PET and SPECT, Elsevier Academic Press, 2004, pp. 421-442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. S. Lalush and M. N. Wernick, “Iterative image reconstruction”, in Emission Tomography: The Fundamentals of PET and SPECT, Elsevier Academic Press, 2004, pp. 443-472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. Maxim, “Filtered backprojection reconstruction and redundancy in Compton camera imaging”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 23, no. 1, 2014, pp. 332-341. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- B. F. Hutton, “Recent advances in iterative reconstruction for clinical SPECT/PET and CT”, Acta Oncologica, vol. 50, no. 6, 2011, pp. 851-858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- J. Qi and R. M. Leahy, “Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography”, Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 51, no. 15, 2006, pp. R541. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- L. A. Shepp and Y. Vardi, “Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 1, no. 2, 1982, pp. 113-122. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- L. Parra and H. H. Barrett, “List-Mode Likelihood: EM Algorithm and Image Quality Estimation Demonstrated on 2-D PET”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 17, no. 2, 1998, pp. 228-235. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M. V. Ranganath, A. P. Dhawan and N. Mullani, “A multigrid expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for positron emission tomography”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 7, no. 4, 1988, pp. 273-278. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- L. Kaufman, “Implementing and accelerating the EM algorithm for positron emission tomography”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 6, no. 1, 1987, pp. 37-51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- J. Fessler and A. O. Hero, “Space-alternating generalized expectationmaximization algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 42, no. 10, 1994, pp. 2664-2677. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. M. Hudson and R. S. Larkin, “Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 13, no. 4, 1994, pp. 601-609. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Sato, Y. Terasaka, W. Utsugi, H. Kikuchi, H. Kiyooka and T. Torii, “Radiation imaging using a compact Compton camera mounted on a crawler robot inside reactor buildings of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station”, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 56, no. 9-10, 2019, pp. 801-808. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Kishimoto, J. Kataoka, T. Nishiyama, T. Taya and S. Kabuki, “Demonstration of three-dimensional imaging based on handheld Compton camera”, Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 10, no. 11, 2015, pp. P11001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Kishimoto, J. Kataoka, T. Taya, L. Tagawa, S. Mochizuki, S. Ohsuka, T. Nagao, K. Kurita, M. Yamaguchi, N. Kawachi, K. Matsunaga, H. Ikeda, E. Shimosegawa and J. Hatazawa, “First demonstration of multicolor 3-D in vivo imaging using ultra-compact Compton camera”, Scientific reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017, pp. 2110. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E. Muñoz, J. Barrio, J. Bernabéu, A. Etxebeste, C. Lacasta, G. Llosá, A. Ros, J. Roser and J. F. Oliver, “Study and comparison of different sensitivity models for a two-plane Compton camera”, Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 63, no. 13, 2018, pp. 135004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Wu, S. Zhang and L. Li, “An accurate probabilistic model with detector resolution and Doppler broadening correction in list-mode MLEM reconstruction for Compton camera”, Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 67, no. 12, 2022, pp. 125017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. J. Wilderman, N. H. Clinthorne, J. A. Fessler and W. L. Rogers, “Listmode maximum likelihood reconstruction of Compton scatter camera images in nuclear medicine”, in IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, vol. 3, 1998, pp. 1716-1720. [Google Scholar]
- M. Z. Hmissi, A. Iltis, C. Tata, G. Zeufack, L. Rodrigues, B. Mehadji, C. Morel and H. Snoussi, “First images from a CeBr 3/LYSO: Ce Temporal Imaging portable Compton camera at 1.3 MeV”, in 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2018, pp. 1-3. [Google Scholar]
- V. Maxim, X. Lojacono, E. Hilaire, J. Krimmer, E. Testa, D. Dauvergne, I. Magnin and R. Prost, “Probabilistic models and numerical calculation of system matrix and sensitivity in list-mode MLEM 3D reconstruction of Compton camera images”, Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 61, no. 1, 2016, pp. 243. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- L. C. Parra, “Reconstruction of cone-beam projections from Compton scattered data”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 47, no. 4, 2000, pp. 1543-1550. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Mehadji, M. Dupont, Y. Boursier and C. Morel, “Extension of the ListMode MLEM Algorithm for Poly-Energetic Imaging with a Compton Camera”, in 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, 2018, pp. 1-8. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Feng, J. M. Létang, D. Sarrut and V. Maxim, “Influence of Doppler broadening model accuracy in Compton camera list-mode MLEM reconstruction”, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, vol. 29, no. 13, 2021, pp. 3509-3529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. H. Barrett, T. White and L. C. Parra, “List-mode likelihood”, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 14, no. 11, 1997, pp. 2914-2923. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- K. Lange and R. Carson, “EM Reconstruction Algorithms for Emission and Transmission Tomography”, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 8, no. 2, 1984, pp. 306-316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.