EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 288 (2023) EPJ Web Conf., 288 (2023) 07011 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 288, 2023
ANIMMA 2023 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 07011
Number of page(s) 6
Section Decommissioning, Dismantling and Remote Handling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328807011
Published online 21 November 2023
  1. F. Carrel et al., “GAMPIX: A new gamma imaging system for radiological safety and Homeland Security Purposes, ” in 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Valencia, Spain: IEEE, Oct. 2011, pp. 4739–4744. doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6154706. [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Montemont et al., “NuVISION: a Portable Multimode Gamma Camera based on HiSPECT Imaging Module, ” in 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), Atlanta, GA: IEEE, Oct. 2017, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2017.8532713. [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Lebrun et al., “ISGRI: The INTEGRAL Soft Gamma-Ray Imager, ” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 411, no. 1, pp. L141–L148, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1051/00046361:20031367. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. O. Godet et al., “The X-/Gamma-ray camera ECLAIRs for the Gammay-ray burst mission SVOM, ” 2014, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1406.7759. [Google Scholar]
  5. C. G. Wahl et al., “The Polaris-H imaging spectrometer, ” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip., vol. 784, pp. 377–381, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2014.12.110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Accorsi, “Design of a near-field coded aperture cameras for high-resolution medical and industrial gamma-ray imaging, ” Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8684 [Google Scholar]
  7. E. E. Fenimore and T. M. Cannon, “Coded aperture imaging with uniformly redundant arrays, ” Appl. Opt., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 337, Feb. 1978, doi: 10.1364/AO.17.000337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. R. Gottesman and E. E. Fenimore, “New family of binary arrays for coded aperture imaging, ” Appl. Opt., vol. 28, no. 20, p. 4344, Oct. 1989, doi: 10.1364/AO.28.004344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. H. Dicke, “Scatter-Hole Cameras for X-Rays and Gamma Rays, ” Astrophys. J., vol. 153, p. L101, Aug. 1968, doi: 10.1086/180230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. G. Ables, “Fourier Transform Photography: A New Method for X-Ray Astronomy, ” Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 172–173, Dec. 1968, doi: 10.1017/S1323358000011292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Ubertini et al., “IBIS: The Imager on-board INTEGRAL, ” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 411, no. 1, pp. L131–L139, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1051/00046361:20031224. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Amgarou et al., “A comprehensive experimental characterization of the iPIX gamma imager, ” J. Instrum., vol. 11, no. 08, pp. P08012–P08012, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/11/08/P08012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Schoepff et al., “Nanopix, a smart and highly miniaturized gamma camera for robotic radiological characterization, ” presented at the SFEN DEM 2021 – International Conference on Decommissioning Challenges: Industrial Reality, Lessons learned and Prospects, Avignon, France, Jun. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Le Breton et al., “The Spid-X gamma camera: A miniature gamma ray integral field spectrometer for nuclear industry applications, ” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip., vol. 1047, p. 167722, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2022.167722. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. E. Grindlay and J. Hong, “Optimizing wide-field coded aperture imaging: radial mask holes and scanning, ” presented at the Optical Science and Technology, SPIE’s 48th Annual Meeting, O. Citterio and S. L. O’Dell, Eds., San Diego, California, USA, Jan. 2004, p. 402. doi: 10.1117/12.506260. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. G. M. FitzGerald, “A Rotating Scatter Mask for Inexpensive Gamma-Ray Imaging in Orphan Source Search: Simulation Results, ” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 340–348, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TNS.2014.2379332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Hellfeld, P. Barton, D. Gunter, L. Mihailescu, and K. Vetter, “A Spherical Active Coded Aperture for $4\pi $ Gamma-Ray Imaging, ” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 2837–2842, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TNS.2017.2755982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Poikela et al., “Digital column readout architectures for hybrid pixel detector readout chips, ” J. Instrum., vol. 9, no. 01, pp. C01007–C01007, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/9/01/C01007. [Google Scholar]
  19. L. A. Shepp and Y. Vardi, “Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography, ” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 113–122, Oct. 1982, doi: 10.1109/TMI.1982.4307558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.