Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conf.
Volume 295, 2024
26th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2023)
Article Number 07045
Number of page(s) 8
Section Facilities and Virtualization
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429507045
Published online 06 May 2024
  1. J. Albrecht, A.A. Alves, G. Amadio, G. Andronico, N. Anh-Ky, L. Aphecetche, J. Apostolakis, M. Asai, L. Atzori et al., Computing and software for big science 3, 7 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. The CMS Collaboration, Journal of Instrumentation 3, S08004 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Peruzzi, G. Petrucciani, A. Rizzi, for the CMS Collaboration, The NanoAOD event data format in CMS (IOP Publishing, 2020), Vol. 1525, p. 012038, https://dx.doi. org/10.1088/1742-6596/1525/1/012038 [Google Scholar]
  4. G.A. Stewart, P. Elmer, G. Eulisse, L. Gouskos, S. Hageboeck, A.R. Hall, L. Heinrich, A. Held, M. Jouvin, T.J. Khoo et al., HSF IRIS-HEP Second analysis ecosystem workshop report (2022), https://zenodo.org/record/7418818 [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Benjamin, K. Bloom, B. Bockelman, L. Bryant, K. Cranmer, R. Gardner, C. Hollowell, B. Holzman, E. Lançon, O. Rind et al., Analysis facilities for HL-LHC (2022), arXiv 2203.08010, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.08010 [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Ciangottini, T. Boccali, A. Ceccanti, D. Spiga, D. Salomoni, T. Tedeschi, M. Tracolli, EPJ Web Conf. 251, 02045 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Thain, T. Tannenbaum, M. Livny, Concurrency - Practice and Experience 17, 323 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J.L. Henning, ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 34, 4, 1 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Barisits, T. Beermann, F. Berghaus, B. Bockelman, J. Bogado, D. Cameron, D. Christidis, D. Ciangottini et al., Computing and Software for Big Science 3, 11 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Hanushevsky, H. Ito, M. Lassnig, R. Popescu, A. De Silva, M. Simon, R. Gardner, V. Garonne, J. De Stefano, I. Vukotic et al., EPJ Web Conf. 214, 04008 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Bauerdick, D. Benjamin, K. Bloom, B. Bockelman, D. Bradley, S. Dasu, M. Ernst, R. Gardner, A. Hanushevsky, H. Ito et al., Journal of Physics: Conference Series 396, 042009 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dask Development Team, Dask: Library for dynamic task scheduling (2016), https://dask.org [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Leon Holgado, nanoaod_base_analysis (2023), https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.8187177 [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Piparo, P. Canal, E. Guiraud, X.V. Pla, G. Ganis, G. Amadio, A. Naumann, E. Tejedor, EPJ Web Conf. 214, 06029 (2019) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Rieger, Y. Rath, L. Geiger, P. Fackeldey, E. G., J.L. Holgado, Nollde, F. von Cube, B.P. Kinoshita, D. Savoiu et al., riga/law (2023), https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.3703205 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.