EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 299 (2024) EPJ Web of Conf., 299 (2024) 01025 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conf.
Volume 299, 2024
EFM22 – Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2022
Article Number 01025
Number of page(s) 12
Section Contributions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429901025
Published online 04 July 2024
  1. R. Matas, M. Novák, J. Kňourek, Numerical Simulations of Flow in Electrostatic Precipitators, MATEC Web Conf. 2020, 328, 02021. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/202032802021 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Zhuangbo, Z. Long, K. Adamiak, A Critical Review of Models Used in Numerical Simulation of Electrostatic Precipitators. Informatics Control Measurement in Economy and Environment Protection 2016, 6, 9-17. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0009.5182. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. F. Zhang, Z. X. Li, W. Li, Y. Gao, Q. Li, Numerical Simulation of Air Distribution Plate at the Inlet of Wet Electrostatic Precipitator. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2014, 494-495, 756-762. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.494-495.756. ISSN 1662-7482. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Guo, A. Yu, J. Guo, Numerical Modelling of ESP for Design Optimization. Procedia Engineering 2015, 102, 1366-1372. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.268. ISSN 18777058. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Q. F. Hou, B. Y. Guo, L. F. Li, A. B. Yu, Numerical Simulation of Gas Flow in an Electrostatic Precipitator. Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries. Melbourne, Australia, December 9-11, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. S. Malipatil, V. V. Nagathan, Numerical Simulation of an Electrostatic Precipitator. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology 2014, 9, 291-295. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. M. E. Haque, M. G. Rasul, M. M. Khan, A. V. Deev, N. Subaschandar, Flow Distribution inside an Electrostatic Precipitator: Effects of Uniform and Variable Porosity of Perforated Plate. Proceedings of the 5th IASME/WSEAS Int. Conference on Heat Transfer, Thermal Engineering and Environment, Athens, Greece, August 25-27, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Sun, X. Yu, H. Liao, Z. Peng, X. Long, B. Lou, Numerical Simulation of Airflow Distribution in Electrostatic-Fabric Integrated Precipitator. 4th International Conference on Environmental, Energy and Biotechnology, Madrid, Spain, June 15-17, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Z. Du, Q. Xie, Numerical Simulation for Predicting Influence of Flow Pattern in Electrostatic Precipitator on Exit Re-entrainment Loss. 11th International Conference on Electrostatic Precipitation, Hangzhou, China, 2008; Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89251-9_39 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Novák, R. Matas, J. Sedláček, Numerical simulations of flue gas flow in a first stage filter with top inlet - Modifications of the inlet chamber inserts. AIP Conference Proceedings 2017, 1889, 020026. DOI: 10.1063/1.5004360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. M. E. Haque, M. G. Rasul, A. Deev, M. M. K. Khan, J. Zhou, Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow inside the Electrostatic Precipitator of a Power Plant. Proceedings of the 2006 WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Fluid Mechanics. Miami, Florida, USA, January 18-20, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Jędrusik, Physical and numerical modelling of gas flow in electrostatic precipitator. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny 2017, 1, 230-233. DOI: 10.15199/48.2017.02.50. ISSN 0033-2097. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. R. Swaminathan, N. V. Mahalakshmi, Numerical Modelling of Flow through Perforated Plates Applied to Electrostatic Precipitator. Journal of Applied Sciences 2010, 10, 2426-2432. DOI: 10.3923/jas.2010.2426.2432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Bhasker, Flow Simulation in Electro-Static-Precipitator (ESP) Ducts with Turning Vanes. Advances in Engineering Software 2011, 42, 501-512. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.04.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. Duan, M. M. Yovanovich, Y. S. Muzychka, Fully developed turbulent flow pressure drop in circular and noncircular ducts. Journal of Fluids Engineering 2012, 134, 061201-1 - 061201-10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Sulovcova, R. Nosek, J. Jandacka, M. Holubcik, Geometrical Optimization of the Flue Gas Path with Regard to the Reduction of Particulate Matter. Emission Control Science and Technology 2018, 4, 1-5. DOI: 10.1007/s40825-018-0084-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Pospíšil, M. Lisý, M. Špiláček, Optimalization of Afterburner Channel in Biomass Boiler Using CFD Analysis. Acta Polytechnica 2016, 56, 379-387. DOI: 10.14311/AP.2016.56.0379 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Jeanaustin, CFD Analysis for Layout Optimization of Flue Gas Ducting between Air Preheater and Electrostatic Precipitator. IJEDR 2018, 6, 465-480. [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Tůma, L. Pavlík, Připravenost zdrojů skupiny ČEZ na limity dle BAT - AEL od roku 2021. 22. ročník konference „Technologie pro elektrárny a teplárny na tuhá paliva“. Mendlov, Czech Republic, May 22-23, 2019. Available online https://www.tespo-eng.cz/images/zpravy/29-22-rocnik-konference-technologie-pro-elektrarny-a-teplarny-na-tuha-paliva-minulosti/CEZ_na_limity_BAT-AEL_od_r_2021_Medlov_2019.pdf (accessed 9.4. 2021) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.