Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 305, 2024
6th International Conference on Applications of Optics and Photonics (AOP2024)
Article Number 00013
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202430500013
Published online 15 October 2024
  1. C. Zhai, “Performance of rectangular QAM/FSO communication systems in the anisotropic nonKolmogorov ground-to-satellite uplink,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 14(9), 713–724 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.456657 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Samy, H. C. Yang, and T. Rakia, et al., “Spaceair-ground FSO networks for high-throughput satellite communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 61(3), 82–87 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.002.2200018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hemmati, H., Biswas, A., Djordjevic, I.B.: Deep Space Optical Communications: Future Perspectives and Applications. Proceedings of IEEE 99(11),(November 2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2160609 [Google Scholar]
  4. Sans, M., Sodnik, Z., Zayer, I., Daddato, R.: “Design of the ESA Optical Ground Station for Participation in LLCD”, Proc. International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS) 2012, 3-1, Ajaccio, Corsica, France, October 9–12, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2045510 [Google Scholar]
  5. Sodnik, Z., Czichy, R.: “Design Data Summary of the ESA Optical Ground Station for In-Orbit Check-Out of Laser Communication Payloads and for the Observation and Registration of Space Debris”. ESA Specifications for the Artemis OGS OPALE project. Ref.: TEC-MMO/267/ZS. May 2, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.464106 [Google Scholar]
  6. Internal ESA Artemis OGS OPALE Measurement Results. 2003-2004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Sodnik, Z., Smit, H., Sans, M., Giggenbach, D., Becker, P., Mata-Calvo, R., Fuchs, C., Zayer, I., Anucara, M.L., Schulz, K., Widmer, J., Arnold, F., Mosberger, M., Alonso, A., Montilla, I.: “Results from a Lunar Laser Communication Experiment between NASA’s LADEE Satellite and ESA’s Optical Ground Station”, Proc. International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS) 2014, S2-1, Kobe, Japan, May 7-9, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-1919 [Google Scholar]
  8. Sodnik, Z., Heese, C., Arapoglou, P.-D., Schulz, K.-J., Zayer, I., Daddato, R., Kraft, S.: “Deep-Space Optical Communication System (DOCS) for ESA’s Space Weather Mission to Lagrange Orbit L5”. IEEE International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS), November 1416,2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSOS.2017.8357207 [Google Scholar]
  9. Andrews, L.C., Phillips, R.L., Hopen, C.Y.: Laser Beam Propagation through Random Media. SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington USA (2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/3.626196 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Andrews, L.C., Phillips, R.L., Hopen, C.Y.: Laser Beam Scintillation with Applications. SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington USA (2001). https://doi.org/10.1117/3.412858 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Al-Juboori, Haider M., and Dirk Giggenbach. “Design of Computer Identification System for GEO Satellite Link Characterization.”, Journal of Al-Ma’moon College, 25, 2015. https://doi.org/10.6595.224/621. [Google Scholar]
  12. Moll, Florian, and Haider M. Al-Juboori. “Investigation and Improvement of Adaptive System Model for Free-Space Optical Communication.” Journal of Al-Ma’moon College 27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.7293.215/823 [Google Scholar]
  13. Al-Juboori, Haider M., and James Garland. “Laser Beam Propagation Features via Atmospheric Turbulence-Induced Beam Wander: Testbed Conceptual Design.” In COAT-2023-workshop (Comm. & Observations through Atmospheric Turbulence), 2023. https://hal.science/hal-04246206/ [Google Scholar]
  14. Giggenbach, D. “Optimierung der optischen Freiraumkommunikation durch die AtmosphäreFocal array receiver.” Universität der Bundeswehr, München (2004). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.